| << | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1567
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[1557] The text gives, “ut insequerentur.…Verbum, et inimicum,” etc. The sense seems to be as above, supposing either that the verb insequerentur is used with the meaning of assailing, persecuting, or that the ut is put for ut ne, as is the case with the excæcat ut at the close of the sentence.
[1559] Eph. vi. 12; 2 Cor. iv. 4.
[1560] Reading differens. But Codex Casinensis gives disserens.
[1561] Transformare.
[1562] Informatum.
[1564] Cf.Heb. viii. 13.
[1566] In inscitias ire vultis. It is proposed to read inficias = and yet ye desire to deny the truth. Routh suggests, et odistis et in inscitiam ire vultis = and ye hate it, and choose to take your way into ignorance.
[1567] Supplying observetis in the clause ut legem, etc.
[1568] Prævaricatorem. Gal. ii. 18 [Vulgate. But see p. 176].
[1570] Or, standard.
[1571] Titulo.
[1572] Ergastula.
[1573] Or, in the wicked one. 1 John v. 19.
[1574] The text gives “extra eum.” Routh suggests Deum, outside of God.
[1575] Vas.
[1576] The text gives simply “quod Dei substantia,” etc. We may perhaps adopt, with Routh, “quod si Dei,” etc.
[1577] Sedes. [“Thrones,” as in Milton.] Routh suggests sidera, luminaries.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0166 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page