Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1707

Introductory Notice to Archelaus.

[1697] John i. 12.

[1698] Matt. xiii. 35.

[1699] Reading reliqui per ordinem for the qui per ordinem of the codex.

[1700] Rom. ii. 15.

[1701] Rom. ii. 14.

[1702] Reading “per hunc modum.” But the Codex Casinensis gives “per hunc mundum”—through this world.

[1703] 2 Cor. iii. 7.

[1704] Gal. iii. 13.

[1705] 1 Cor. xv. 56.

Chapter XXIX

[1706] John viii. 44.

[1707] John viii. 44.

[1708] The text is “sufficit tibi hæc sunt an habes et alia.” Routh proposes “sufficientia tibi hæc sunt,” etc.

[1709] Routh would make it = You will come under the condemnation…you will have to bear: he suggests eris ergo for ero ego, and feras for feram.

[1710] Rom. v. 14.

[1711] Rom. v. 14.

[1712] Nec aliter nisi essent ingenita. Routh, however, would read esset for essent, making it = and that death could be nothing else than unbegotten.

[1713] Reading ex tempore for the corrupt exemplo re of the codex.

[1714] 1 Cor. xv. 54.

[1715] Wisd. i. 13.

[1716] The text gives discere, to learn; but dicere seems the probable reading.

Chapter XXX

[1717] Reading inquam for the iniquam of the Codex Casinensis. But Routh suggests iniquæ, in reference to what has been said towards the close of ch. xxviii.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0166 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>