| << | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1815
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[1807] The Codex Casinensis gives, “de Persida venientem monet;” for which corrupt reading it is proposed to substitute “de Perside venientem Manem,” etc.
[1808] Reading percipiendum with the Vulgate. But the Codex Casinensis has perficiendum.
[1810] These words falsi apostoli seem to be added by way of explanation, as they are not found either in the Greek or the Vulgate.
[1811] Matt. xxiv. 4-5, 23-26.
[1812] Radicati.
[1813] Immobiles.
[1814] Audivimus.
[1817] The text gives “circum cucurri,” perhaps for “cursum cucurri.” The Vulgate has “cursum consummavi.”
[1819] The text gives “ex vobis.” But perhaps we should read “ex nobis” = none of us.
[1820] The Codex Casinensis has “Galatam facies vicit, o nostras feras”, for which we adopt the correction, “Galatam facies, nec ita nos.”
[1821] O Satan! The Codex Casinensis gives “anathema esse ana,” which may be an error, either for “anathema es, Satana,” or for “anathema es et maranatha.” [“O Satan” is less probable.]
[1822] The text is legum; for which regum, kings, is also suggested.
[1824] The text gives, “qui neque necessarium aliquem locum sortitus es,” etc. Routh proposes “necessarii.” The sense seems to be that Manes had nothing to prove any connection between him and Christ.
[1825] Reading “quos luto,” etc., for the “quod luto” of the codex.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0166 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page