<< | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1844
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[1834] The sense is again obscure throughout this sentence, owing to the state of the text. The codex gives us this clause, “nulli alio atque posterum,” etc., for which “nulli alii æque in posterum” is proposed.
[1836] Reading “qui solus,” for the sed, etc., of the codex. See also Luke x. 22.
[1839] Inducias fortassis aliquas quærit.
[1840] Reading “non plane, non tam obscure,” etc., instead of the “non plane nota,” etc., of the Codex Casinensis.
[1841] “Protectores,” on which term consult Ducangius in his Glossary.
[1842] Signa, dracones, labaros.
[1844] The text gives simply, sicut enim parva. We may adopt, with Routh, “sicut enim cum parva,” etc.
[1845] Reading “sic ut istius comparatione,” for the “sicut istius paratione” of the codex.
[1846] Reading se ductores, for the seductores, etc., of the codex.
[1847] Seculis.
[1848] Continentes.
[1850] The precise meaning and connection are somewhat obscure here. The text gives, “verbum enim ducis obtinet locum, opera vero regis.” And the idea is taken to be, that the actual work of thoroughly doing away with the ignorance of men was something that suited only the perfect King who was expected, and that had not been accomplished by Manes.
[1853] Alluding to 2 Tim. iii. 6.
[1854] Routh inserts interdum pœnitet = sometimes he uses the penitential style, which Migne omits.
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0166 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page