Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1854

Introductory Notice to Archelaus.

[1844] The text gives simply, sicut enim parva. We may adopt, with Routh, “sicut enim cum parva,” etc.

Chapter XXXVIII

[1845] Reading “sic ut istius comparatione,” for the “sicut istius paratione” of the codex.

[1846] Reading se ductores, for the seductores, etc., of the codex.

[1847] Seculis.

[1848] Continentes.

[1849] Phil. ii. 13.

[1850] The precise meaning and connection are somewhat obscure here. The text gives, “verbum enim ducis obtinet locum, opera vero regis.” And the idea is taken to be, that the actual work of thoroughly doing away with the ignorance of men was something that suited only the perfect King who was expected, and that had not been accomplished by Manes.

[1851] Phil. iii. 19.

[1852] 1 Thess. v. 1, 2.

[1853] Alluding to 2 Tim. iii. 6.

[1854] Routh inserts interdum pœnitet = sometimes he uses the penitential style, which Migne omits.

[1855] Matt. xxv. 44.

[1856] Matt. xxv. 46; Luke xiii. 27.

Chapter XXXIX

[1857] The text gives the plural form stolas, perhaps for stolam.

[1858] The text gives fugere, apparently in the sense of fugare.

[1859] 1 Cor. xi. 19.

[1860] [Note the testimony against the persecution of heretics,—a characteristic of early Christians which too soon began to disappear, notably in Alexandria under Cyril.]

[1861] Excipi.

[1862] This Diodorus appears to be called Trypho by Epiphanius, on this Manichæan heresy, n. 11.

[1863] Reading concionaretur for continuaretur.

[1864] This epistle is also mentioned, and its argument noticed, by Epiphanius, Hæres., 11.

Chapter XL

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0166 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>