| << | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1909
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[1899] Reading “opera ejus non indiget.” But the Codex Casinensis gives “ore ejus,” etc.
[1900] The Codex Bobiensis reads here, “accidit vero post tempus ut is qui…requireret,” etc. The other codex has, “accedit vero post tempus is qui…requirere.”
[1901] Reading pro respectu with Codex Bobiensis. The other codex gives prospectu.
[1902] Reading invenisse. The Codex Casinensis gives venisse.
[1903] Routh suggests pastor, the shepherd, for pater.
[1904] Reading cognata, with Codex Bobiensis, instead of cognita.
[1907] We adopt the reading vides, instead of the faulty unde of the Codex Casinensis.
[1908] Reading quamvis for quum.
[1909] See Heb. iii. 5, 6.
[1910] Luke xvi. 19, etc.
[1911] Infernum. [Sheol, rather, or Hades.]
[1912] The reading of the Codex Casinensis is, “rogavit dives simul uno tempore ut edisceret majorem doctrinam.” But the other codex gives, “uno tempore discere majorem doctrinam ab Abraham” = entreated that he might learn the superior doctrine of Abraham. For edisceret we may read with Routh ediscerent.
[1915] The Codex Casinensis gives, “exige ab eo illa quæ fraudem interceperat;” the other codex gives, “et exigi ab eo illa quæ fraude interceperat.” The correct reading probably would be, “exigi ab eo illa quæ per fraudem interceperat.”
[1916] We adopt the conjecture of Valesius, viz., abstinentia. The Codex Bobiensis gives absentia.
[1919] Reading inflammantur. It may perhaps be inflantur = puffed up.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0166 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page