| << | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1916
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[1907] We adopt the reading vides, instead of the faulty unde of the Codex Casinensis.
[1908] Reading quamvis for quum.
[1909] See Heb. iii. 5, 6.
[1910] Luke xvi. 19, etc.
[1911] Infernum. [Sheol, rather, or Hades.]
[1912] The reading of the Codex Casinensis is, “rogavit dives simul uno tempore ut edisceret majorem doctrinam.” But the other codex gives, “uno tempore discere majorem doctrinam ab Abraham” = entreated that he might learn the superior doctrine of Abraham. For edisceret we may read with Routh ediscerent.
[1915] The Codex Casinensis gives, “exige ab eo illa quæ fraudem interceperat;” the other codex gives, “et exigi ab eo illa quæ fraude interceperat.” The correct reading probably would be, “exigi ab eo illa quæ per fraudem interceperat.”
[1916] We adopt the conjecture of Valesius, viz., abstinentia. The Codex Bobiensis gives absentia.
[1919] Reading inflammantur. It may perhaps be inflantur = puffed up.
[1922] Reading et parum hoc est, with Codex Bobiensis, instead of the et pauperum hoc est of Codex Casinensis. We may also render it as ="but it is far from being the case that gifts are cast,” etc.
[1923] The Codex Bobiensis reads inferuntur; the other codex gives offeruntur, offered.
[1926] The text gives sed abuti, and the Codex Bobiensis has sed et abuti. But the reading ought probably to be sed et uti, or sed etiam uti. Routh, however, notices that abutor is found with the sense of utor.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0166 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page