<< | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1931
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[1922] Reading et parum hoc est, with Codex Bobiensis, instead of the et pauperum hoc est of Codex Casinensis. We may also render it as ="but it is far from being the case that gifts are cast,” etc.
[1923] The Codex Bobiensis reads inferuntur; the other codex gives offeruntur, offered.
[1926] The text gives sed abuti, and the Codex Bobiensis has sed et abuti. But the reading ought probably to be sed et uti, or sed etiam uti. Routh, however, notices that abutor is found with the sense of utor.
[1927] Plane.
[1929] Mark ii. 19. [I have slightly accommodated the translation to this text.]
[1930] In semetipsum causam circumcisionis excepit.
[1931] [From Job 2.10; Heb. 4.15; 6.1-8 Scripture abounds in this teaching. Comp. Lam. iii. 33.]
[1932] The Codex Bobiensis gives, “viæ compendiosum nobis tramitem demonstrare.” We adopt the reading, “viæ spatia compendioso nobis tramite demonstrare.”
[1936] Compendia viæ.
[1940] Reading “prævaricator” instead of “prædicator.” The sense would seem strictly to require, a debtor to the law.
[1941] Atramentum.
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0166 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page