Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1934

^[1924] Luke xiv. 33.

^[1925] Matt. viii. 10.

^[1926] The text gives sed abuti, and the Codex Bobiensis has sed et abuti. But the reading ought probably to be sed et uti, or sed etiam uti. Routh, however, notices that abutor is found with the sense of utor.

^[1927] Plane.

^[1928] Matt. xii. 8.

^[1929] Mark ii. 19. [I have slightly accommodated the translation to this text.]

^[1930] In semetipsum causam circumcisionis excepit.

^[1931] [From Job 2.10; Heb. 4.15; 6.1-8 Scripture abounds in this teaching. Comp. Lam. iii. 33.]

^[1932] The Codex Bobiensis gives, “viæ compendiosum nobis tramitem demonstrare.” We adopt the reading, “viæ spatia compendioso nobis tramite demonstrare.”

^[1933] Matt. vii. 15.

^[1934] Matt. xxiii. 27.

^[1935] Matt. v. 8.

^[1936] Compendia viæ.

^[1937] Matt. vii. 12.

^[1938] 2 Cor. xiii. 3.

^[1939] 1 Cor. vii. 18, 19.

^[1940] Reading “prævaricator” instead of “prædicator.” The sense would seem strictly to require, a debtor to the law.

^[1941] Atramentum.

^[1942] Rom. ii. 29.

^[1943] The Codex Bobiensis gives, “figuli opus aufers aut fictilium.” The Codex Casinensis has, “figuli opus et ars aut fictilium.” We adopt “figuli opus aut ars fictilium.”

^[1944] Adopting “nequaquam” for “nec quemquam.”

10 per page

Search Comments

This page has been visited 0166 times.

Contents