Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2023

Introductory Notice to Archelaus.

[2013] The text gives “similis facere astrologo,” for which Routh proposes “similis factus est,” etc.

Chapter XLVII

[2014] Matt. x. 28.

[2015] The text is, “quibus utique repensari non possunt,” etc. Routh proposes repensare.

[2016] Reading “sicut vox Jesu.” The Codex Casinensis gives, “sicut vos Jesu.” Routh suggests servator.

[2017] John i. 18; iii. 13.

[2018] Matt. x. 40.

[2019] John vi. 38.

[2020] Matt. xv. 24.

[2021] Matt. xii. 47.

[2022] The text gives, “Virgo castissima et immaculata ecclesia,” = the most pure virgin and spotless church. But the word “ecclesia” is probably an erroneous addition by the hand of the scribe. Or, as Routh hints, there may be an allusion, in the word ecclesia, to the beginning of the twelfth chapter of the Apocalypse. [See Pearson, On the Creed, art. iii. p. 290.]

[2023] From this it may perhaps be gathered that Marcellus had now come along with Archelaus to the residence of Diodorus.

[2024] Scribere ausus est. Compare (note 1) p. 224, infra.

[2025] Matt. xxii. 42. We read Davidis essefor David Jesse.

[2026] Matt. xvi. 16.

[2027] The text gives, “Quod si prior fefellit, causa ad scriptorem rejicienda est.” [i.e., to the copyist; in this case the corrupter.]

[2028] Consonantibus duntaxat.

Chapter XLVIII

[2029] Phil. ii. 9.

[2030] Sibi ipsi.

[2031] Secundum id quod scriptorem fefellit. [i.e. on that supposition.]

[2032] 1 Cor. xiii. 11.

[2033] Phil. iii. 13.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0166 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>