Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2034

Introductory Notice to Archelaus.

[2024] Scribere ausus est. Compare (note 1) p. 224, infra.

[2025] Matt. xxii. 42. We read Davidis essefor David Jesse.

[2026] Matt. xvi. 16.

[2027] The text gives, “Quod si prior fefellit, causa ad scriptorem rejicienda est.” [i.e., to the copyist; in this case the corrupter.]

[2028] Consonantibus duntaxat.

Chapter XLVIII

[2029] Phil. ii. 9.

[2030] Sibi ipsi.

[2031] Secundum id quod scriptorem fefellit. [i.e. on that supposition.]

[2032] 1 Cor. xiii. 11.

[2033] Phil. iii. 13.

[2034] Reading “debuitne etiam” for the bad version of the Codex Casinensis, “debuit et etiam.”

[2035] The text gives, “se ipso judicante,” for which “te ipso,” etc., may be substituted.

[2036] In the Codex Casinensis the sentence stands in this evidently corrupt form: “cum enim peccatis bonus et gravatus ad discipulatum diligit.” We adopt the emendation given in Migne: “cum enim peccatis onustos et gravatos ad discipulatum delegit.”

[2037] Matt. x. 37.

[2038] Luke ix. 59, 60.

[2039] Propitius esto, Domine.

[2040] Matt. xvi. 22. [Possibly the first words by which Satan fell.]

[2041] Matt. xvi. 21.

[2042] Matt. xvi. 23. [Satan seems to have rebelled against man’s creation.]

[2043] Luke iv. 34, reading sanctus Deus. [i.e., not the received text.]

[2044] Reading silere. The Codex Casinensis gives sinire, which may be meant for sinere = give over.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0166 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>