Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2076

Introductory Notice to Archelaus.

^[2066] Artifex.

^[2067] Phil. ii. 7.

^[2068] Hominem.

^[2069] Hominem eum tantummodo ex Maria.

^[2070] Or, effect, per profectum.

^[2071] Effect. [i.e., progressively.]

^[2072] Routh puts this interrogatively = Is it then your position that He really is a man, that is to say, one who is flesh and blood? Well, but if so, then it will follow, etc.

^[2073] Or, as.

^[2074] Reading “sicut homo, hac opinione,” for the “sicut homo ac opinione” of the Codex Casinensis.

^[2075] The Codex Casinensis reads, “hanc quæstionem diffigenter aptare tam manifestarem atque manifeste dissolverem.” We follow the emendation, “hanc quæstionem diligenter aptatam manifestarem,” etc.

^[2076] [A signum verecundiæ which rebukes the awful inquisitiveness concerning the conception of Mary which disgraced the late pontiff, Pius IX. To what blasphemous pruriency of thought and expression has not such an invasion of decency given rise! See St. Bernard, Opp. tom. i. p. 392. He rebukes the heresy as profane.]

^[2077] The text gives tempus recusat. Routh proposes tempus requirit = which the occasion requires.

^[2078] This is a purely conjectural reading, “ut dicam silex,” etc. The Codex Casinensis gives, “ut dicam dilere non homo.” But Routh, in reference to ch. xv., throws out the idea that we should read delire = thou dotard, or, lunatic. [P. 190, supra, as if Manes = μανικὸς.]

^[2079] Columbarium furem.

^[2080] The text gives suæ. Routh suggests tuæ.

^[2081] The text is, “non solum autem, sed adventus nomen delebitur.” It may perhaps be = and not the foundation, but the name, of an advent would be done away.

^[2082] Phil. ii. 7.

^[2083] The text gives “quo magnum,” etc., for which we adopt “quod magnum,” etc.

^[2084] Matt. iv. 3.

^[2085] Or perhaps, = which was also, quod erat tabernaculum, etc.

^[2086] The Codex Casinensis gives “Ignorabat autem propter qui genuisset Filium Dei prædicabat regnum cœlorum, qui erat,” etc. We follow generally the emendations adopted in Migne: “Ignorabat autem propter quid genuisset Filium Dei, qui prædicabat regnum cœlorum, quod erat habitaculum magnum,” etc. Routh would read “genitus esset Filius Dei,” etc.

10 per page

Search Comments

This page has been visited 0166 times.

Contents