Archelaus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2085

^[2075] The Codex Casinensis reads, “hanc quæstionem diffigenter aptare tam manifestarem atque manifeste dissolverem.” We follow the emendation, “hanc quæstionem diligenter aptatam manifestarem,” etc.

^[2076] [A signum verecundiæ which rebukes the awful inquisitiveness concerning the conception of Mary which disgraced the late pontiff, Pius IX. To what blasphemous pruriency of thought and expression has not such an invasion of decency given rise! See St. Bernard, Opp. tom. i. p. 392. He rebukes the heresy as profane.]

^[2077] The text gives tempus recusat. Routh proposes tempus requirit = which the occasion requires.

^[2078] This is a purely conjectural reading, “ut dicam silex,” etc. The Codex Casinensis gives, “ut dicam dilere non homo.” But Routh, in reference to ch. xv., throws out the idea that we should read delire = thou dotard, or, lunatic. [P. 190, supra, as if Manes = μανικὸς.]

^[2079] Columbarium furem.

^[2080] The text gives suæ. Routh suggests tuæ.

^[2081] The text is, “non solum autem, sed adventus nomen delebitur.” It may perhaps be = and not the foundation, but the name, of an advent would be done away.

^[2082] Phil. ii. 7.

^[2083] The text gives “quo magnum,” etc., for which we adopt “quod magnum,” etc.

^[2084] Matt. iv. 3.

^[2085] Or perhaps, = which was also, quod erat tabernaculum, etc.

^[2086] The Codex Casinensis gives “Ignorabat autem propter qui genuisset Filium Dei prædicabat regnum cœlorum, qui erat,” etc. We follow generally the emendations adopted in Migne: “Ignorabat autem propter quid genuisset Filium Dei, qui prædicabat regnum cœlorum, quod erat habitaculum magnum,” etc. Routh would read “genitus esset Filius Dei,” etc.

^[2087] John xix. 37.

^[2088] Matt. iii. 17.

^[2089] Pugillum plenum solis mihi affer aut modium plenum.

^[2090] 2 Cor. v. 21.

^[2091] Partis.

Chapter LI

^[2092] The text is, “et ultra ei non sinerent ad propria remeare.” Routh suggests ultro for ultra.

^[2093] Reading unus, instead of “vos, comitibus,” etc.

^[2094] Reading “quem etiam” instead of “quæ etiam.”

^[2095] The Codex Casinensis gives, “ipse quidem me dicere recusavit,” etc. We adopt the correction in Migne, “sed ne ipse quidem dicere recusavit,” etc.

10 per page

Search Comments

This page has been visited 0166 times.

Contents