| << | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2091
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[2081] The text is, “non solum autem, sed adventus nomen delebitur.” It may perhaps be = and not the foundation, but the name, of an advent would be done away.
[2083] The text gives “quo magnum,” etc., for which we adopt “quod magnum,” etc.
[2085] Or perhaps, = which was also, quod erat tabernaculum, etc.
[2086] The Codex Casinensis gives “Ignorabat autem propter qui genuisset Filium Dei prædicabat regnum cœlorum, qui erat,” etc. We follow generally the emendations adopted in Migne: “Ignorabat autem propter quid genuisset Filium Dei, qui prædicabat regnum cœlorum, quod erat habitaculum magnum,” etc. Routh would read “genitus esset Filius Dei,” etc.
[2089] Pugillum plenum solis mihi affer aut modium plenum.
[2091] Partis.
[2092] The text is, “et ultra ei non sinerent ad propria remeare.” Routh suggests ultro for ultra.
[2093] Reading unus, instead of “vos, comitibus,” etc.
[2094] Reading “quem etiam” instead of “quæ etiam.”
[2095] The Codex Casinensis gives, “ipse quidem me dicere recusavit,” etc. We adopt the correction in Migne, “sed ne ipse quidem dicere recusavit,” etc.
[2096] Superiores quidem causas Domini, etc.
[2097] Reading “sed et optimus architectus ejus, fundamentum,” etc. The Codex Casinensis has the corrupt lection, “sed et optimos architectos ei fundamentum,” etc. [Had this been said of Peter?]
[2098] Cf.1 Cor. iii. 10. [Had this been said of Peter, what then?]
[2099] Cf.Acts xiv. 23.
[2100] Cf.1 Tim. iii. 1. [Clement cap. xliv., vol. i. p. 17, this series.]
[2101] Various other forms are found for this name Scythianus. Thus we find Scutianus and Excutianus,—forms which may have arisen through mere clerical errors. The Codex Reg. Alex. Vat. gives Stutianus. [But see Routh, R. S., vol. v. p. 186.]
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0166 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page