| << | Contents | >> |
Archelaus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2093
Introductory Notice to Archelaus.
[2083] The text gives “quo magnum,” etc., for which we adopt “quod magnum,” etc.
[2085] Or perhaps, = which was also, quod erat tabernaculum, etc.
[2086] The Codex Casinensis gives “Ignorabat autem propter qui genuisset Filium Dei prædicabat regnum cœlorum, qui erat,” etc. We follow generally the emendations adopted in Migne: “Ignorabat autem propter quid genuisset Filium Dei, qui prædicabat regnum cœlorum, quod erat habitaculum magnum,” etc. Routh would read “genitus esset Filius Dei,” etc.
[2089] Pugillum plenum solis mihi affer aut modium plenum.
[2091] Partis.
[2092] The text is, “et ultra ei non sinerent ad propria remeare.” Routh suggests ultro for ultra.
[2093] Reading unus, instead of “vos, comitibus,” etc.
[2094] Reading “quem etiam” instead of “quæ etiam.”
[2095] The Codex Casinensis gives, “ipse quidem me dicere recusavit,” etc. We adopt the correction in Migne, “sed ne ipse quidem dicere recusavit,” etc.
[2096] Superiores quidem causas Domini, etc.
[2097] Reading “sed et optimus architectus ejus, fundamentum,” etc. The Codex Casinensis has the corrupt lection, “sed et optimos architectos ei fundamentum,” etc. [Had this been said of Peter?]
[2098] Cf.1 Cor. iii. 10. [Had this been said of Peter, what then?]
[2099] Cf.Acts xiv. 23.
[2100] Cf.1 Tim. iii. 1. [Clement cap. xliv., vol. i. p. 17, this series.]
[2101] Various other forms are found for this name Scythianus. Thus we find Scutianus and Excutianus,—forms which may have arisen through mere clerical errors. The Codex Reg. Alex. Vat. gives Stutianus. [But see Routh, R. S., vol. v. p. 186.]
[2102] This seems the general idea meant to be conveyed. The text, which is evidently corrupt, runs thus: “in qua cum eum habitaret cum Ægyptiorum sapientiam didicisset.” The Codex Reg. Alex. Vat. reads, “in qua cum habitaret, et Ægyptiorum,” etc. In Migne it is proposed to fill up the lacunæ thus: “in qua cum diu habitaret, depravatus est, cum Ægyptiorum sapientiam didicisset.” Routh suggests, “in qua cum ea habitaret,” etc.
[2103] The Codex Casinensis reads Terbonem for Terebinthum.But in Cyril of Jerusalem, in his Catechesis, 6, as well as in others, we regularly find Τέρβινθον, Terbinthum, or Terebinthum, given as the name of the disciple of Scythianus. The form Tereventus is also given; and the Codex Reg. Alex. Vat. has Terybeneus. The statement made here as to these books being written by Terebinthus is not in accordance with statements made by Cyril and others, who seem to recognise Scythianus alone as the author. As to the name Terebinthus itself, C. Ritter, in his Die Stupa’s, etc., p. 29 thinks that it is a Græcized form of a predicate of Buddha, viz., Tere-hintu, Lord of the Hindoos. Others take it simply to be a translation of the Hebrew הלָא”, the terebinth.See a note on this subject in Neander’s Church Hist., ii. 166 (Bohn). [Routh, ut supra, p. 187.]
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0166 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page