| << | Contents | >> |
Arnobius
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3744
Introductory Notice to Arnobius.
[3734] Nescire Hildebrand, with good reason, considers a gloss.
[3735] Nihilfor the ms. mihi which makes nonsense of the sentence.
[3736] This somewhat wide-spread opinion found an amusing counterpart in the doctrines of Rorarius (mentioned by Bayle, Dict. Phil.), who affirmed that the lower animals are gifted with reason and speech, as we are.
[3737] Lit., “superior.”
[3738] Lit., “tending to no reasons.”
[3739] Omni vero verissimum est certoque certissimum—the superlative for the comparative.
[3740] Lit., “finished with the perfection of.”
[3741] Lit., “by perversity”—s-c-ævitate, the reading of the ms., LB., Orelli, Hild., and Oehler, all others omitting c—“by the rage;” except Stewechius, who reads servitute—“slavery.”
[3742] Or, perhaps, “the goodness of the Supreme planted”—generositas eos adsereret principalis.
[3743] Lit., “opposition;” i.e., “the setting of one party against the other.”
[3744] Lit., “weighed with balancing of equality.”
[3745] Lit., “bounded by the comprehensions of names;” i.e., possibly, “the good are certainly few enough to be numbered, perhaps even to be named.”
[3746] So LB., reading ex cruciatibusfor the ms. scruc.
[3747] Lit., “of.”
[3748] Lit., “admiration is sought for by the putting together”—congregatione.
[3749] Lit., “a comparison of the worst may effect that we,” etc.
[3750] So all edd. except Hildebrand, who gives as the reading of the ms., qui-d—“what! do they assert.”
[3751] Lit., “by the force of,” vi,—an emendation of Heraldus for the ms. in.
[3752] So most edd., reading pertinacifor the ms. -ium—“by the opposition of persistent virtues,” which is retained in both Roman edd., Gelenius, Canterus, Hildebrand, and Oehler.
[3753] So Stewechius and later edd., reading ut…auferant, except Hildebrand, who gives as the ms. reading, et…-unt—“shun…and remove,” etc. The first four edd. read ne…afferant—“that they may not bring upon themselves,” etc.
[3754] So the ms. and first four edd., Orelli (who, however, seems to have meant to give the other reading), and Oehler, reading corri-p-i, for which the others read -igi—“corrected,” except Hildebrand, who without due reason gives -rumpi—“corrupted.”
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0321 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page