| << | Contents | >> |
Arnobius
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3937
Introductory Notice to Arnobius.
[3927] According to Orelli’s punctuation, “whether there are these gods in heaven whom,” etc.
[3928] So LB. and later edd., from a conj. of Meursius, reading diebus lustricis for the ms. ludibriis; read by some, and understood by others, as ludicris, i.e., festal days.
[3929] The ms. followed by Hild. and Oehler, reads neque…in ulla cognatione—“in no relationship,” for which the other edd. give cognitione, as above.
[3930] So all edd., reading populares, except Hild. and Oehler, who receive the conj. of Rigaltius, populatim—“among all nations;” the ms. reading popularem.
[3931] Censeri, i.e., “written in the list of gods.”
[3932] Otherwise, “how many make up the list of this name.”
[3933] So Orelli, receiving the emendation of Barth, incogniti nomine, for the ms. in cognitione, -one being an abbreviation for nomine. Examples of such deities are the Novensiles, Consentes, etc., cc. 38–41.
[3934] Lit., “who, except a few gods, do not engage in the services of the rest.”
[3935] Orelli would explain pro parte consimili as equivalent to pro uno vero Deo—“for the one true God.”
[3936] Lit., “take the oaths of allegiance” or military oaths, using a very common metaphor applied to Christians in the preceding book, c. 5.
[3937] Lit., “suppliant hands.” It has been thought that the word supplices is a gloss, and that the idea originally was that of a band of soldiers holding out their hands as they swore to be true to their country and leaders; but there is no want of simplicity and congruity in the sentence as it stands, to warrant us in rejecting the word.
[3938] i.e., than the inventors of such fables had shown.
[3939] Lit., “from us infants;” i.e., as compared with such a man as Cicero.
[3940] Secundas actiones. The reference is evidently to a second speaker, who makes good his predecessor’s defects.
[3941] Lit., “are unwilling to admit into their ear the reading of opinions,” etc.
[3942] Both Christians and heathen, it is probable, were concerned in the mutilation of de Nat. Deorum.
[3943] So Gelenius, reading dicta for the ms. dictitare. The last verb is comprobate, read reprobate—“condemn,” by all edd. except Hild. and Oehler.
[3944] Lit., “with familiarity of speech.”
[3945] A formula used when they sought to propitiate the author of some event which could not be traced to a particular deity; referring also to the cases in which there were different opinions as to the sex of a deity.
[3946] Lit., “even of mean understanding.”
[3947] Lit., “by the renewing of perpetual succession.”
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0321 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page