| << | Contents | >> |
Arnobius
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 4111
Introductory Notice to Arnobius.
[4101] Lit., “convexity.”
[4102] Lit., “be of.”
[4103] Lit., “to the state of the world.”
[4104] Lit., “who have been so formed, that some things are said by us,” nobis, the reading of Oberthür and Orelli for the ms. in nos—“with regard to us,” which is retained by the first four edd., Elm., Hild. and Oehler.
[4105] i.e., transit in vocabulum sinistri; in being omitted in the ms. and both Roman edd.
[4106] Lit., “the turning round of the body being changed.”
[4107] So Oehler, reading positione, sed tempore sed, for the ms. positionis et temporis et.
[4108] No mention is made of this deity by any other author.
[4109] Lit., “that he may do what.”
[4110] Lit., “good condition,” habitudinem.
[4111] Lit., “a disreputable act.”
[4112] So the ms. reading flagitiis, followed by all edd. except LB. and Orelli, who read plagiis—“kidnapping.”
[4113] Of this goddess, also, no other author makes mention but the germ may be perhaps found in Lucretius (ii. 1116–7), where nature is termed perfica, i.e., “perfecting,” or making all things complete. [The learned translator forgets Tertullian, who introduces us to this name in the work Arnobius imitates throughout. See vol. iii. p. 140.]
[4114] i.e., in cubiculis præsto est virginalem scrobem effodientibus maritis.
[4115] The first five edd. read Mutunus. Cf. ch. 11. [I think it a mistake to make Mutubus = Priapus. Their horrible deformities are diverse, as I have noted in European collections of antiquities. The specialty of Mutunus is noted by our author, and is unspeakably abominable. All this illustrates, therefore, the Christian scruples about marriage-feasts, of which see vol. v. note 1, p. 435.]
[4116] Lit., the “fancies” or “imaginations” of false gods. Meursius proposed to transpose the whole of this sentence to the end of the chapter, which would give a more strictly logical arrangement; but it must be remembered that Arnobius allows himself much liberty in this respect.
[4117] Of these three deities no other mention is made.
[4118] The ms., LB., Hild., and Oehler read qui—“who brings;” the other edd., as above, quia.
[4119] So the ms. (cf. ch. 11), first five edd., Oberth., Hild., and Oehler; the other edd. read Nodutim Ter.
[4120] So the ms., both Roman edd., and Oehler; the other edd. reading Vibilia, except Hild., Viabilia.
[4121] The ms. reads nam—“for,” followed by all edd. except Orelli, who reads jam as above, and Oehler, who reads etiam—“also.”
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0321 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page