Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Arnobius

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 4301

Introductory Notice to Arnobius.

[4291] The ms. and edd. read cred-i-musne—“do we believe,” for which Meursius suggests -e- as above.

[4292] Lit., “or whether.” Below the ms. reads corruptly ad ipsum—“to him.”

[4293] The ms. reads scire, but “knows” would hardly suit the context. Instead of adopting any conjecture, however, it is sufficient to observe, with Oehler, that scire is elsewhere used as a contraction for sciscere.

[4294] The ms. omits ut.

[4295] So Cujacius, inserting vi, omitted by the ms.

Chapter III

[4296] Lit., “so great.”

[4297] Lit., “the fumigation of verbenæ,” i.e., of boughs of the laurel, olive, or myrtle.

[4298] The ms. omits ut.

[4299] Lit., “the uncertain things of that ambiguity.”

Chapter IV

[4300] Lit., “unless a mortal anticipated”—præsumeret, the ms. reading.

[4301] So Oehler, supplying quem.

[4302] Lit., “liveliness of heart is procured.”

[4303] Lit., “why.”

Chapter V

[4304] So Ovid also (Metam., i. 321), and others, speak of Themis as the first to give oracular responses,

[4305] So the ms. and edd., reading quam incestis, except Orelli, who adopts the conjecture of Barthius, nequam—“lustful Jupiter with lewd desires.”

[4306] So the ms. and edd., except Hildebrand and Oehler, who throughout spell Agdestis, following the Greek writers, and the derivation of the word from Agdus.

[4307] So Ursinus suggested, followed by later edd., ex utroque (ms. utra.) sexu; for which Meursius would read ex utroque sexus—“and a sex of both,” i.e., that he was a hermaphrodite, which is related by other writers.

Chapter VI

[4308] Lit., “him.”

[4309] Lit., “of thirsting.”

[4310] Lit., “in time of need.”

[4311] So the reading of the ms. and edd., unum laqueum, may be rendered; for which Canterus conjectured imum—“the lowest part of the noose.”

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0321 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>