| << | Contents | >> |
Cyprian
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2914
Introductory Notice to Cyprian.
[2904] [Stephen’s presumption in this step is the dark spot in his record. It was a brutum fulmen, however, even in his own province. See Augustine’s testimony, Oxf. ed. (note l) p. 258.]
[2906] [Another of Cyprian’s striking aphorisms: “Consuetudo sine veritate vetustas erroris est.”]
[2907] Esdras iv. 38–40.
[2909] Original, “docibilis.” 2 Tim. ii. 24.
[2911] [Elucidation XVIII. See pp. 380 (note 1) and 322 (note 2).]
[2914] [It is obvious that the Cyprianic theory of unity has not the least connection with a theory depending on communion with a particular See. But this calculates the maxim, p. 384, note 7.]
[2915] [See letter lxxi. p. 378, supra.]
[2916] Oxford ed.: Ep. lxxv. [This is one of the most important illustrations of Ante-Nicene unity and its laws. Elucidation XIX.]
[2917] [But observe, in contrast, the language of Stephen, which he rebukes (sec. 26, infra), and his schismatical conduct towards the whole African Church.]
[2918] To the effect that he would not hold communion with them so long as they should persist in their opinion concerning the baptism of heretics, as Eusebius tells us from a letter of Dionysius of Alexandria to Xistus, the successor of Stephen, Hist. Eccles., book vii. c. 4.
[2921] [This is a sentence to be admired, apart from anything in the general subject.]
[2922] [Note the ignorance of these Oriental bishops of any superior authority in the Bishop of Rome. Athanas., opp., p. 470, Paris.]
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0690 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page