| << | Contents | >> |
Cyprian
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3087
Introductory Notice to Cyprian.
[3077] Cap. xx. p. 252, note 7, etc. See vol. iii., this series.
[3078] Vol. iii. p. 260, cap, xxxvi. and note 13.
[3080] This canon of the Council of Milevis ( a.d. 402), at a much later date, maintains the ancient principle.
[3081] Calvin, De necessitate reformanda ecclesiæ, Works, vol. viii. p. 60. Amstelodami, 1667.
XIV. (The bishop should be chosen in the presence of the people, p. 371.)
[3082] Elucidation III. p. 411, supra.
[3083] Bingham, Antiquities, book iii. capp. ii., iii.
XV. (Cornelius…a peaceable and righteous priest, etc., p. 371.)
[3084] Eusebius, H. E., book vi. cap. xliii.
XVI. (Epistle lxxi.…To Stephen their brother, p. 378.)
[3085] Consult Cave, Dissertation on the Ancient Church Government, appended to his Primitive Christianity, p. 366.
XVII. (In the name of, etc. Since Three are One, pp. 380, 382.)
[3086] Vol. iii. p. 631.
[3087] Burgon, Letters from Rome, p. 34. London, 1862.
[3088] Introduction to Criticism, etc., p. 453, also 564. Compare the Treatise on Unity, sec. 6, p. 423, infra.
[3089] Calling attention to evidence that verse 8 is a sort of apodosis implying theprotasis of verse 7, as read in the Vulgate and English Received.
XVIII. (Return to our Lord and Origin, p. 389.)
[3090] P. 322, note 2.
[3091] See secs. 9 and 10.
XIX. (Firmilianus to Cyprian, p. 390.)
[3093] See illustrations in Faber’s Difficulties of Romanism, cap. iii. pp. 46–88, London, 1830. This work is a succinct reply to Berington and Kirk lately reprinted in New York. It refutes itself. Compare vol. i. pp. ix. and x., with the new dogmas, vol. iii. pp. 443–460.
[3094] See Eusebius, H. E., vi. cap. lxiii.
[3095] Tertullian, vol. iii. p. 661.
XXI. (Senators and men of importance and Roman knights, p. 408.)
[3096] Vol. iii. p. 45, this series.
Treatise I. On the Unity of the Church.
[3097] [Written a.d. 251. Although, in order of time, this treatise would be the third, I have placed it here because of its dignity, and because of its importance as a key to the entire writings of Cyprian; for this theory is everywhere the underlying principle of his conduct and of his correspondence. It illustrates the epistles of Ignatius as well as his own, and gives the sense in which the primitive Christians understood these words of the Creed, “the Holy Catholic Church.” This treatise has been subjected to falsifying interpolations, long since exposed and detected, to make it less subversive of the countertheory of Rome as developed by the school doctors. Elucidation I.]
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0690 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page