Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

The Pastor of Hermas

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 382

Introductory Note to The Pastor of Hermas

[372] All the translations and Clemens Alexandrinus (Strom., vi. 6, 46) have this passage. It is omitted in Lips.

Chap. XVII.

[373] [Rev. vii. 4.]

[374] Name of the Son of God. Name of God.—Lips. [Rom. x. 17.]

[375] [Rev. xiv. 4.]

Chap. XVIII.

[376] God in Pal.; Lord in Vat. and Æth.; Christ in Lips.

[377] [Luke xii. 47, 48.]

[378] Omitted in Vat., Æth., Lips.

[379] [Eph. v. 27.]

Chap. XX.

[380] Omitted in Lips. The text from Vat. Substantially the same in the other two. [Matt. xiii. 5.]

[381] Matt. xix. 23, 24. [Mark x. 23.]

Chap. XXI.

[382] Omitted in Lips.

[383] [The imagery of our Lord’s parables everywhere apparent. Also, the words of Scripture recur constantly.]

Chap. XXIII.

[384] Jas. iv. 12. [Matt. xviii. 33.]

Chap. XXIV.

[385] Ecclus. xx. 15, xli. 22; Jas. i. 5.

Chap. XXV.

[386] Cf. Donaldson’s Hist. of Christ. Lit., vol. i. p. 291. [This beautiful chapter, and its parable of the fountains of living water, may well be read with that passage of Leighton which delighted Coleridge: Com. on 1 Pet. i. 10-12.]

Chap. XXVI.

[387] διάκονοι. [Deacons, evidently, or stewards. Acts vi. 1]

[388] [Ezek. xxxiv. 3.]

Chap. XXVII.

[389] Bishops. Bishops, that is, presidents of the churches.—Vat. [This textual peculiarity must have originated at the period when the Ignatian use of episcopus was becoming naturalized in Rome. It was originally common to all pastors, local or regionary.]

Chap. XXVIII.

[390] [This passage (with Vision iii. 2, and especially Similitude v. 3) has been pressed into the service of those who seek to find “super-erogatory merit” in the Fathers. See 1 Cor. vii. 38. But why not begin with the Scriptures which Hermas doubtless has in mind, such as Rev. iii. 4, 5, “They are worthy”? Does this ascribe to them any merit apart from (“worthy is the Lamb”) the only meritorious cause of salvation? So also Rev. vii. 14, xiv. 4, 5. The primitive Fathers accepted such truths like innocent children, and loved them. They believed St. Paul as to degrees of glory (1 Cor. xv. 41), and our Lord Himself as to the awards (Matt. xx. 21-23) of mercy to fruits of grace: and they are no more responsible for forced constructions that have been put upon them by afterthought and subsequent heresy, then our blessed Lord can be charged with all that has overloaded His precious sayings (Matt. xix. 12 or xiv. 18). The principle of deficient works of faith, which is the corresponding idea of the negative side, appears in St. Paul (1 Cor. iii. 13-15), and has been abused to sustain the whole system of creature merit, and the monstrous atfterthought of purgatory. Those, therefore, who read such ideas into “The Ante-Nicene Fathers,” to diminish their credit, often, unintentionally (1) help the perverters of truth to claim the Fathers, and (2) give them the like aid in claiming the Scriptures. See p. 34, supra, note 3.]

Chap. XXIX.

[391] Matt. xviii. 3.

[392] [Mark ix. 36.]

Chap. XXX.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0098 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>