Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Hippolytus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1118

Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.

[1108] Hippolytus, by his argument, recognises the duty not merely of overthrowing error but substantiating truth, or in other words, the negative and positive aspect of theology. His brief statement (chap. xxviii.–xxx.) in the latter department, along with being eminently reflective, constitutes a noble specimen of patristic eloquence. [This is most just: and it must be observed, that having summed up his argument against the heresies derived from carnal and inferior sources, and shown the primal truth, he advances (in chap. xxviii.) to the Nicene position, and proves himself one of the witnesses on whose traditive testimony that sublime formulary was given to the whole Church as the κτῆμα ἐς ἀεὶ of Christendom,—a formal countersign of apostolic doctrine.]

II. (Caulacau, p. 52.)

[1109] I venture to state this to encourage young students to keep pen in hand in all their researches, and always to make notes.

III. (The Phrygians call Papa, p. 54.)

[1110] Pompey and others were called imperatores before the Cæsars, but who includes them with the Roman emperors?

[1111] How St. Peter would regard it, see 1 Pet. v. 1-3. I am sorry to find Dr. Schaff, in his useful compilation, History of the Christian Church, vol. ii. p 166, dropping into the old ruts of fable, after sufficiently proving just before, what I have maintained. He speaks of “the insignificance of the first Popes,”—meaning the early Bishops of Rome, men who minded their own business, but could not have been “insignificant” had they even imagined themselves “Popes.”

[1112] See Bossuet, passim, and all the Gallican doctors down to our own times. In England the “supremacy” was never acknowledged, nor in France, until now.

IV. (Contemporaneous heresy, p. 125.)

[1113] See his Hippol., vol. i. pp. 209, 311.

[1114] See vol. ii. p. 298, this series.

[1115] p. 207.

[1116] Vol. iv. p 114, Elucidation II., this series.

[1117] Even Quinet notes this. See his Ultramontanism, p. 40, ed. 1845.

[1118] Bunsen gives it as the thirty-fifth, vol. i. p. 311.

[1119] Of which we shall learn in vol. viii., this series.

[1120] See Bingham, book ix. cap. i. sec. 9.

V. (Affairs of the Church, p. 125.)

[1121] Wordsworth, chap. viii. p. 93.

VI. (We offered them opposition, p. 125.)

[1122] See vol. i. pp. 415, 460, this series.

VII. (Heraclitus the Obscure, p. 126.)

[1123] Introduction to Greek Classics, p. 228.

IX. (The episcopal throne, p. 128.)

[1124] See vol. ii. p. 12, also iv. 210.

[1125] See Treatise on the Lapsed, infra.

XI. (All consented—we did not, p. 128.)

[1126] Ver. 17.

XII. (Our condemnatory sentence, p. 131.)

[1127] See p. v. supra.

[1128] Ps. cvi. 30-31.

XIV. (Attempt to call themselves a Catholic Church, p. 131.)

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0196 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>