| << | Contents | >> |
Hippolytus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1121
Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.
[1111] How St. Peter would regard it, see 1 Pet. v. 1-3. I am sorry to find Dr. Schaff, in his useful compilation, History of the Christian Church, vol. ii. p 166, dropping into the old ruts of fable, after sufficiently proving just before, what I have maintained. He speaks of “the insignificance of the first Popes,”—meaning the early Bishops of Rome, men who minded their own business, but could not have been “insignificant” had they even imagined themselves “Popes.”
[1112] See Bossuet, passim, and all the Gallican doctors down to our own times. In England the “supremacy” was never acknowledged, nor in France, until now.
IV. (Contemporaneous heresy, p. 125.)
[1113] See his Hippol., vol. i. pp. 209, 311.
[1114] See vol. ii. p. 298, this series.
[1115] p. 207.
[1116] Vol. iv. p 114, Elucidation II., this series.
[1117] Even Quinet notes this. See his Ultramontanism, p. 40, ed. 1845.
[1118] Bunsen gives it as the thirty-fifth, vol. i. p. 311.
[1119] Of which we shall learn in vol. viii., this series.
[1120] See Bingham, book ix. cap. i. sec. 9.
V. (Affairs of the Church, p. 125.)
[1121] Wordsworth, chap. viii. p. 93.
VI. (We offered them opposition, p. 125.)
[1122] See vol. i. pp. 415, 460, this series.
VII. (Heraclitus the Obscure, p. 126.)
[1123] Introduction to Greek Classics, p. 228.
IX. (The episcopal throne, p. 128.)
[1124] See vol. ii. p. 12, also iv. 210.
[1125] See Treatise on the Lapsed, infra.
XI. (All consented—we did not, p. 128.)
[1126] Ver. 17.
XII. (Our condemnatory sentence, p. 131.)
[1127] See p. v. supra.
XIV. (Attempt to call themselves a Catholic Church, p. 131.)
[1130] Bunsen, p. 134; Theodor., tom. iv. pt. i. p. 343, ed. Hal. 1772.
[1131] St. Hippol., p. 315.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0196 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page