Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Hippolytus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 120

Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.

[110] De Legibus, iv. 7 (p. 109, vol. viii. ed. Bekker).

[111] Timæus, c. xvi. (p. 277, vol. vii. ed. Bekker). The passage runs thus in the original: “Gods of gods, of whom I am Creator and Father of works, which having been formed by Me, are indissoluble, through, at all events, My will.”

[112] The word is literally a cup or bowl, and, being employed by Plato in an allegorical sense, is evidently intended to signify the anima mundi (soul of the world), which constituted a sort of depository for all spiritual existences in the world.

[113] Or, “that there exists a necessity for the corruption of everything created.”

[114] Or, “are confirmed by that (philosopher Plato), because he asserts,” etc.; or, “those who assert the soul’s immortality are especially confirmed in their opinion, as many as affirm the existence of a future state of retribution.”

[115] Or, “that he changes different souls,” etc.

[116] Or, “during.”

[117] Diogenes Laertius, in describing the system of the Stoics, employs the same word in the case of their view of virtue.

[118] This is supplied from the original; the passage occurs in the Phædrus, c. lx. (p. 86, vol. i. ed. Bekker).

[119] The word Adrasteia was a name for Nemesis, and means here unalterable destiny.

[120] The passage occurs in Clilophon (p. 244, vol. vi. ed. Bekker).

[121] The text, as given by Miller, is scarcely capable of any meaning. The translation is therefore conjectural, in accordance with alterations proposed by Schneidewin.

[122] Or, “declares.”

Chapter XVII.—Aristotle; Duality of Principles; His Categories; His Psychology; His Ethical Doctrines; Origin of the Epithet “Peripatetic.”

[123] Or, “the fifth body, in which it is supposed to be, along with the other four (elements);” or, “the fifth body, which is supposed to be (composed) of the other four.”

[124] Hippolytus expresses himself in the words of Stobæus, who says (Eclog., ii. 274): “And among reputed external blessings are nobility, wealth, glory, peace, freedom, friendship.”

[125] Or, “glory, the confirmed power of friends.”

Chapter XVIII.—The Stoics; Their Superiority in Logic; Fatalists; Their Doctrine of Conflagrations.

[126] One of the mss. elucidates the simile in the text thus: “But if he is not disposed, there is absolutely a necessity for his being drawn along. And in like manner men, if they do not follow fate, seem to be free agents, though the reason of (their being) fate holds assuredly valid. If, however, they do not wish to follow, they will absolutely be coerced to enter upon what has been fore-ordained.”

[127] Or, “is immortal.” Diogenes Laertius (book vii.) notices, in his section on Zeno, as part of the Stoic doctrine, “that the soul abides after death, but that it is perishable.”

[128] Or, “through what is incorporeal;” that is, through what is void or empty space.

[129] Or, “resurrection;” or, “resistance;” that is, a resisting medium.

Chapter XIX.—Epicurus; Adopts the Democritic Atomism; Denial of Divine Providence; The Principle of His Ethical System.

[130] The atomic theory is, as already mentioned by Hippolytus, of more ancient date than Epicurus’ age, being first broached by Leucippus and Democritus. This fact, however, has, as Cudworth argues, been frequently overlooked by those who trace the doctrine to no older a source than the founder of the Epicurean philosophy.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0196 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>