Hippolytus

Footnotes

^[33] It might be, “any opinion that may be subservient to the subject taken in hand.” This is Cruice’s rendering in his Latin version. A different reading is, “we must not be silent as regards reasons that hold good,” or, “as regards rational distinctions,” or, “refrain from utterances through the instrument of reasoning.” The last is Roeper’s.

^[34] Another reading is, “bringing into a collection.”

^[35] Or, “the Spirit.”

^[36] Or, “indicating a witness;” or, “having adduced testimony.”

^[37] Or, “a starting-point.”

^[38] Or, “devoting his attention to;” or, “having lighted upon.”

^[39] The chief writers on the early heresies are: Irenæus, of the second century; Hippolytus, his pupil, of the third; Philastrius, Epiphanius, and St. Augustine, of the fourth century. The learned need scarcely be reminded of the comprehensive digest furnished by Ittigius in the preface to his dissertation on the heresies of the apostolic and post-apostolic ages. A book more within the reach of the general reader is Dr. Burton’s Inquiry into the Heresies of the Apostolic Age.

Chapter I.—Thales; His Physics and Theology; Founder of Greek Astronomy.

^[40] [These were: Periander of Corinth, b.c. 585; Pittacus of Mitylene, b.c. 570; Thales of Miletus, b.c. 548: Solon of Athens, b.c. 540; Chilo of Sparta, b.c. 597; Bias of Priene; Cleobulus of Lindus, b.c. 564.]

^[41] Or, “motions of the stars” (Roeper).

^[42] Or, “carried along” (Roeper).

^[43] Or,“ that which is divine.” See Clemens Alexandrinus, Strom., v. pp. 461, 463 (Heinsius and Sylburgius’ ed.). Thales, on being asked, “What is God?” “That,” replied he, “which has neither beginning nor end.”

^[44] Or, “see.”

Chapter II.—Pythagoras; His Cosmogony; Rules of His Sect; Discoverer of Physiognomy; His Philosophy of Numbers; His System of the Transmigration of Souls; Zaratas on Demons; Why Pythagoras Forbade the Eating of Beans; The Mode of Living Adopted by His Disciples.

^[45] Or, “nature.”

^[46] “And arithmetic” (added by Roeper).

^[47] Or, “and he first.”

^[48] Or, “physiognomy.”

^[49] Or, “in conformity with his hypothesis.”

^[50] Or, “the third.”

^[51] Or, “an everlasting nature;” or, “having the roots of an everlasting nature in itself,” the words “as it were” being omitted in some mss.

^[52] Or, “production.”

^[53] It should be probably, “monad, number.” The monad was with Pythagoras, and in imitation of him with Leibnitz, the highest generalization of number, and a conception in abstraction, commensurate with what we call essence, whether of matter or spirit.

10 per page

Search Comments

This page has been visited 0196 times.

Contents