Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Hippolytus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 629

Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.

[619] Matt. iii. 12; Luke iii. 17.

Chapter V.—Simon Appeals to Scripture in Support of His System.

[620] 1 Pet. i. 24.

Chapter VI.—Simon’s System Expounded in the Work, Great Announcement; Follows Empedocles.

[621] Emped., ed. Karst. v. 324.

Chapter VII.—Simon’s System of a Threefold Emanation by Pairs.

[622] νώματος αἶσαν: Miller has γνώμην ἴσην, which yields but little sense.

Chapter VIII.—Further Progression of This Threefold Emanation; Co-Existence with the Double Triad of a Seventh Existence.

[623] These powers are thus arranged:

A. Mind and Intelligence: termed also,—1. Heaven and Earth.

B. Voice and Name: termed also,—2. Sun and Moon.

C. Ratiocination and Reflection: termed also,—3. Air and Water.

Chapter IX.—Simon’s Interpretation of the Mosaic Hexaëmeron; His Allegorical Representation of Paradise.

[624] Gen. ii. 2.

[625] Prov. viii. 22-24.

[626] “Brooded over” (see Gen. i. 2).

[627] Gen. ii. 7.

[628] 1 Cor. xi. 32.

[629] Jer. i. 5.

[630] χωρίον (i.e., locality) is the reading in Miller, which Cruice ingeniously alters into χόριον, the caul in which the fœtus is enclosed, which is called the “after-birth.”

[631] Gen. ii. 10.

[632] This rendering follows Cruice, who has succeeded in clearing away the obscurity of the passage as given in Miller.

Chapter X.—Simon’s Explanation of the First Two Books of Moses.

[633] Odyssey, x. 304 et seq. [See Butcher and Lang, p. 163.]

Chapter XI.—Simon’s Explanation of the Three Last Books of the Pentateuch.

[634] Isa. ii. 4.

[635] Matt. iii. 10; Luke iii. 9.

Chapter XII.—Fire a Primal Principle, According to Simon.

[636] In the Recognitions of Clement we have this passage: “He (Simon) wishes himself to be believed to be an exalted power, which is above God the Creator, and to be thought to be the Christ, and to be called the standing one” (Ante-Nicene Library, ed. Edinburgh, vol. iii. p. 196).

[637] The expression stans (standing) was used by the scholastics as applicable to the divine nature. Interpreted in this manner, the words in the text would be equivalent with “which was, and is, and is to come” (Rev. i. 8). The Recognitions of Clement explain the term thus: “He (Simon) uses this name as implying that he can never be dissolved, asserting that his flesh is so compacted by the power of his divinity, that it can endure to eternity. Hence, therefore, he is called the standing one, as though he cannot fall by any corruption” (Ante-Nicene Library, vol. iii. p. 196). [To be found in vol. viii. of this series, with the other apocryphal Clementines.]

[638] Gen. iii. 24.

Chapter XIV.—Simon Interprets His System by the Mythological Representation of Helen of Troy; Gives an Account of Himself in Connection with the Trojan Heroine; Immorality of His Followers; Simon’s View of Christ; The Simonists’ Apology for Their Vice.

[639] Homer, for instance (See Epiphanius, Hæres., xxi. 3).

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0196 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>