Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Hippolytus

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 683

Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.

[673] κυρία: instead of this has been suggested the reading καὶ ῥιζα, i.e., “which is both the root,” etc.

[674] In all this Valentinus intends to delineate the progress from absolute to phenomenal being. There are three developments in this transition. Absolute being (Bythus and Sige) is the same as the eternal thought and consciousness of God’s own essence. Here we have the primary emanation, viz., Nous, i.e., Mind (called also Monogenes, only-begotten), and Aletheia, i.e., Truth. Next comes the ideal manifestation through the Logos, i.e., Word (obviously borrowed from the prologue to St. John’s Gospel), and Zoe, i.e., Life (taken from the same source). We have then the passage from the ideal to the actual in Anthropos, i.e., Man, and Ecclesia, i.e., Church. These last are the phenomenal manifestations of the divine mind.

[675] τέλειος: Bunsen would read τέλος, which Cruice objects to on account of the word τελειότερος occurring in the next sentence.

Chapter XXV.—The Tenet of the Duad Made the Foundation of Valentinus’ System of the Emanation of Æons.

[676] This follows the text as emended by Bernays.

[677] The number properly should be thirty, as there were two tetrads: (1) Bythus, Sige, Nous, and Aletheia; (2) Logos, Zoe, Ecclesia, and Anthropos. Some, as we learn from Hippolytus, made up the number to thirty, by the addition of Christ and the Holy Ghost,—a fact which Bunsen thinks conclusively proves that the alleged generation of Æons was a subsequent addition to Valentinus’ system.

[678] There is some confusion in Hippolytus’ text, which is, however, removeable by a reference to Irenæus (i. 1).

[679] We subjoin the meanings of these names:—

Ten Æons from Nous and Aletheia, (or) Logos and Zoe, viz.:—

A. Bythus = Profundity.

B. Mixis = Mixture.

C. Ageratos = Ever-young.

D. Henosis = Unification.

E. Autophyes = Self-grown.

F. Hedone = Voluptuousness.

G. Acinetus = Motionless.

H. Syncrasis = Composition.

I. Monogenes = Only-begotten.

J. Macaria = Blessedness.

[680] The following are the meanings of these names:—

Twelve Æons from Anthropos and Ecclesia, (or) Logos and Zoe:—

A. Paracletus = Comforter.

B. Pistis = Faith.

C. Patricus = Paternal.

D. Elpis = Hope.

E. Metricus = Temperate.

F. Agape = Love.

G. Æinous = Ever-thinking.

H. Synesis = Intelligence.

I. Ecclesiasticus = Ecclesiastical.

J. Makariotes = Felicity.

K. Theletus = Volition.

L. Sophia = Wisdom.

[681] [Rev. ii. 24. It belongs to the “depths of Satan” to create mythologies that caricature the Divine mysteries. Cf. 2 Cor. ii. 11.]

[682] This Sophia was, so to speak, the bridge which spanned the abyss between God and Reality. Under an aspect of this kind Solomon (Prov. viii.) views Wisdom; and Valentinus introduces it into his system, according to the old Judaistic interpretation of Sophia, as the instrument for God’s creative energy. But Sophia thought to pass beyond her function as the connecting link between limited and illimitable existence, by an attempt to evolve the infinite from herself. She fails, and an abortive image of the true Wisdom is procreated, while Sophia herself sinks into this nether world.

[683] Miller’s text has, “a well-formed and properly-digested substance.” This reading is, however, obviously wrong, as is proved by a reference to what Epiphanius states (Hær., xxxi.) concerning Valentinus.

Chapter XXVI.—Valentinus’ Explanation of the Existence of Christ and the Spirit.

[684] Or, “Metagogeus”(see Irenæus, i. 1, 2, iii. 1).

[685] Bunsen corrects the passage, “So that she should not be inferior to any of the Æons, or unequal (in power) to any (of them).”

Chapter XXVII.—Valentinus’ Explanation of the Existence of Jesus; Power of Jesus Over Humanity.

[686] ἐνότητος: Miller has νεότητος, i.e., youth. The former is the emendation of Bernays.

[687] This is Bunsen’s text, ὑποστάτους. Duncker reads ὑποστατικὰς, hypostatic.

[688] Some read οὐσίαν (see Theodoret, Hær., c. vii.).

[689] ἐπιστροφὴν; or it may be rendered “solicitude.” Literally, it means a turning towards, as in this instance, for the purpose of prayer (see Irenæus, i. 5).

[690] Valentinus denominates what is psychical (natural) right, and what is material or pathematic left (see Irenæus, i. 5).

[691] Cruice renders the passage thus: “which is denominated right, or Demiurge, while fear it is that accomplishes this transformation.” The Demiurge is of course called “right,” as being the power of the psychical essence (see Clemens Alexandrinus, Hypot. excerpta e Theod., c. 43).

[692] Ps. cxi. 10; Prov. i. 7; ix. 10.

[693] Schneidewin fills up the hiatus thus: “Place of Mediation.” The above translation adopts the emendation of Cruice (see Irenæus, i. 5).

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0196 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>