| << | Contents | >> |
Hippolytus
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 884
Introductory Notice to Hippolytus.
[875] What Hippolytus communicates concerning Prepon is quite new. The only writer who mentions him is Theodoret (Hær. Fab., i. 25), in his article on Apelles.
[876] Schneidewin gives a restored version of these lines. They are found (at lines 338–341) in Stein’s edition of the Empedoclean Verses.
[877] Tertullian combats these heretical notions in his De Carne Christi [vol. viii. p. 521, this series].
[879] Matt. xix. 17; Mark x. 18; Luke xviii. 19.
[880] See [vol. i. p. 350] Irenæus, i. 25; [vol. iii. p. 203] Tertullian, De Anima, c. xxiii.–xxv., and Præscript., c. xlviii.; Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiast., iv. 7, Epiphanius, Hær., xxvii. sec. 2; Theodoret, Hær. Fab., i. 5; and St. Augustine, Hær., c. vii. The entire of this article is taken from Irenæus, and equally coincides with the account given of Carpocrates by Epiphanius.
[881] Or, “came.”
[882] Literally, “cauterize.”
[883] Epiphanius alludes in the same manner to these images.
Chapter XXI.—The System of Cerinthus Concerning Christ.
[884] See [vol. i. pp. 351, 415] Irenæus, i. 26, iii. 2, 3; [vol. iii. p. 651] Tertullian, Præscript., c. xlviii.; Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiast., iii. 28, vii. 25; Epiphanius, Hær., xxviii.; Theodoret, Hær. Fab., ii. 3; St. Augustine, Hær., c. viii.; and St. Jerome, Ep., lxxxix. We have here, as in the preceding articles, Irenæus in the Greek, as Hippolytus’ text corresponds with the Latin version of this portion of Irenæus’ work.
[886] Or, “paternal.”
Chapter XXII.—Doctrine of the Ebionæans.
[887] See [vol. i. p. 352] Irenæus, i. 26; [vol. iii. p. 651] Tertullian, Præscript., c. xlviii.; [vol. iv. p. 429, this series] Origen, Contr. Cels. ii. 1; Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiast., iii. 27; Epiphanius, Hær., xxx.; and Theodoret, Hær. Fab., ii. 2. Hippolytus is indebted in this article partly to Irenæus, and partly to original sources.
[888] Or, “that the Christ of God was named Jesus” (Bunsen).
Chapter XXIII.—The Heresy of Theodotus.
[889] See [vol. iii. p. 654, “two Theodoti”] Tertullian, Præscript., c. liii.; Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiast, v. 27; Epiphanius, Hær., liv.; and Theodoret, Hær. Fab., ii. 5. Clemens Alexandrinus seems to have been greatly indebted to Theodotus, whose system he has explained and commented upon.
Chapter XXIV.—The Melchisedecians; The Nicolaitans.
[890] Concerning the younger Theodotus, see [vol. iii. p. 654] Tertullian, Præscript., c. liii.; Epiphanius, Hær., lv.; and Theodoret, Hær. Fab., ii. 6.
[891] Or, “in reference to” (Bunsen).
[892] Or, “have been adduced” (Miller).
[893] See [ut supra] Irenæus, i. 26; [ut supra] Tertullian, Præscript., c. xlv.; Epiphanius, Hær., c. xxv.; Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiast., iii. 29; Theodoret, Hær. Fab., i. 15; and St. Augustine, Hær., c. v. [But see Clement, vol. ii. p. 373, this series.]
[894] [He understands that the seven (Acts vi. 5) were deacons. Bunsen, i. p. 97.]
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0196 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page