Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Lactantius

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 400

Introductory Notice To Lactantius.

[390] Virg., Georg., iii. 112, 102.

[391] [De Finibus, book v. cap. 28.]

[392] Literally, “since the nature of good things is placed on a steep ascent, that of evil things on a precipitous descent.”

[393] Honestas is used with some latitude of meaning, to express respectability of character, or honourable feeling, or the principle of honour, or virtue itself. [See Philipp. iv. 8.]

Chap. IX.—Of the Chief Good, and the Worship of the True God, and a Refutation of Anaxagoras.

[394] That he might be able to make some answer.

[395] The fall or overthrow.

[396] This sight or spectacle, that is, into this world. This expression is used for the place from which the sight is beheld.

[397]

[398] Would use a greater sound.

[399] Each, viz., the world and the eye.

[400] Expedita, “free from obstacles,” “unembarrassed.”

[401] Humanity, properly that which is characteristic of man, then kindness and humaneness.

[402] Pietas. The word denotes not only piety towards God, but also the affection due to a parent.

Chap. X.—It is the Peculiar Property of Man to Know and Worship God.

[403] The sounds uttered by the beasts, by which they are able to distinguish one another. [Rousseau’s theory goes further.]

Chap. XI.—Of Religion, Wisdom, and the Chief Good.

[404] Multo magis is the reading of the mss.; but multo minus—“much less”—seems preferable.

[405] Liable to fall, perishable.

Chap. XII.—Of the Twofold Conflict of Body and Soul; And of Desiring Virtue on Account of Eternal Life.

[406] According to St. Paul, man consists of three parts—body, soul and spirit. Lactantius appears to use the word soul in the same sense in which the Scriptures speak of spirit. [Vol. i. p. 532.]

[407] Tenuis, as applied to the soul, opposed to solidus, applied to the body.

Chap. XIII.—Of the Immortality of the Soul, and of Wisdom, Philosophy, and Eloquence.

[408] There is a memorable story related by ecclesiastical historians, about a very clever disputant, whose sophistries could not be answered by his fellow-disputants, but who was completely silenced by the simple answers of a Christian otherwise unknown. When questioned about his sudden silence, the sophist replied that others exchanged words for words, but that this simple Christian fought with virtue.

[409] There seems to be a reference to a passage of Terence, in which the poet represents it as the property of man to err. [Or to Cicero, rather: Cujusvis hominis est errare, etc. Philipp. xii. 2.]

[410] Cicero, De Officiis, ii. 2.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0404 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>