| << | Contents | >> |
Methodius
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2830
Introductory Notice to Methodius.
[2820] [Here is our author’s conclusive condemnation of Origen, whose great mistake, I have supposed, gave occasion to this extraordinary work. Possibly the epoch of Anthony had revived such discussions when this was written.]
I. (We here behold only shadows, etc., p. 335.)
[2821] Introduction to the Dialogues, etc., Dobson’s translation, Cambridge, 1836.
II. (Christ Himself is the one who is born, p. 337.)
[2822] See his work On the Apocalypse, Lecture IX. p. 198, ed. Philadelphia, 1852.
[2823] Speaker’s Com., ad loc.
[2824] Vol. v. p. 217, this series.
[2825] Works, vol. i. p. 447, ed. Paris, 1845.
[2826] Dec. 8, 1854.
[2827] See The Eirenicon of Dr. Pusey, ed. New York, 1866.
[2828] [This debate between Orthodoxus and a Valentinian reminds us of the Octavius of Minucius Felix, vol. iv.]
[2833] Iliad, ix. 4, H. (Cowper’s Tr.).
[2835] [See the essay of Archbishop King On the Origin of Evil, ed. Cambridge, 1739. Law’s annotations in this edition are valuable. See also Dr. Bledsoe, Theodicy, and Elucidation VIII. p. 522, vol. ii, this series. Of Leibnitz (refuting Bayle), no need to speak here. Comp. Addison, Spectator, Nos. 237 and 519; also Parnell’s Hermit; also Jer. xii. 1.]
[2836] The reader will here naturally think of the great and long-continued Manichæan controversy.—Tr.
[2837] [See Routh, R. S., tom. ii. p. 98, and note p. 115, and all Routh’s notes on Maximus, the original of Methodius, of whom see Eusebius, H. E., book v. cap. 27.]
[2838] Jahn’s reading is here followed.
[2839] The text is here in an uncertain state. Cf. Migne and Jahn.
[2840] Imperfect. The rest from the Bibliotheca of Photius.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0116 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page