Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Novatian

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 5203

Introductory Notice to Novatian, a Roman Presbyter.

[5193] According to Pamelius, ch. xvii.

[5194] Phil. ii. 6-11.

[5195] [Not “a seipso Deus.” See Bull, Defens., vol. v. p. 685.]

Chapter XXIII. Argument.—And This is So Manifest, that Some Heretics Have Thought Him to Be God the Father, Others that He Was Only God Without the Flesh.

[5196] According to Pamelius, ch. xviii.

[5197] [The Noetians, Hippol., p. 148, supra.]

[5198] [Irenæus, vol. i. p. 527.]

Chapter XXIV. Argument.—That These Have Therefore Erred, by Thinking that There Was No Difference Between the Son of God and the Son of Man; Because They Have Ill Understood the Scripture.

[5199] According to Pamelius, ch. xix.

[5200] John i. 14.

[5201] Matt. i. 23.

[5202] Luke i. 35.

[5203] “The miraculous generation is here represented as the natural, but by no means as the only cause for which He who had no human father was to receive the name of God’s Son.”—Oosterzee, in loco, on Luke.—Tr.

[5204] Principalitas.

[5205] The edition of Pamelius reads: ut sequela nominis in Filio Dei et hominis sit. The words Dei et were expelled by Welchman, whom we have followed.

Chapter XXV. Argument.—And that It Does Not Follow Thence, that Because Christ Died It Must Also Be Received that God Died; For Scripture Sets Forth that Not Only Was Christ God, But Man Also.

[5206] According to Pamelius, ch. xx.

[5207] Matt. x. 28.

[5208] [Luke xx. 38. A solemn admonition is found in the parallel Scripture, Matt. xxii. 29, which teaches us how much we ought to find beneath the surface of Holy Writ.]

Chapter XXVI. Argument.—Moreover, Against the Sabellians He Proves that the Father is One, the Son Another.

[5209] According to Pamelius, ch. xxi.

[5210] Gen. i. 26.

[5211] Gen. xix. 24.

[5212] Ps. ii. 7, 8.

[5213] Ps. cx. 1.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0033 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>