Novatian

Footnotes

Introductory Notice to Novatian, a Roman Presbyter.

^[5308] [1 Cor. vi. 13. A passage probably connected with the Jewish superstition. But see the Peshito-Syriac version on Mark vii. 19. Compare Murdock’s version ad loc., ed. 1855.]

Chapter II. Argument.—He First of All Asserts that the Law is Spiritual; And Thence, Man’s First Food Was Only the Fruit Trees, and the Use of Flesh Was Added, that the Law that Followed Subsequently Was to Be Understood Spiritually.

^[5309] Which, distinguishing between meats, granted certain animals as clean, and interdicted certain others as not clean, especially as all animals were declared “very good,” and even unclean animals were reserved for offspring in Noah’s ark, although they otherwise might have been got rid of, if they ought to have been destroyed on account of their uncleanness.

^[5310] [The divers animals are also parables illustrating human passions and appetites. See Jones of Nayland, vol. xi. p. 1.]

^[5311] Rom. vii. 14.

^[5312] This sentence is very unintelligible, but it is the nearest approach to a meaning that can be gathered from the original.

^[5313] [Gen. ix. 3. The Noachic covenant was Catholic, and foreshadowed Acts x. 15, although clean and unclean beasts were recognised as by natural classification. Gen. vii. 2. Argue as in Gal. iii. 17.]

^[5314] Or, as some read, “for eating,” substituting “esum” for “usum.”

^[5315] Gen. i. 31.

Chapter III. Argument.—And Thus Unclean Animals are Not to Be Reproached, Lest the Reproach Be Thrown Upon Their Author; But When an Irrational Animal is Rejected on Any Account, It is Rather that that Very Thing Should Be Condemned in Man Who is Rational; And Therefore that in Animals the Character, the Doings, and the Wills of Men are Depicted.

^[5316] [See chap. ii. p. 645, supra, note 9.]

^[5317] Sui culpa.

^[5318] [The moral uses of the animal creation are recognised in all languages; as when we say of men, a serpent, a fox, a hog, an ass, etc.; so otherwise, a lion, a lamb, an eagle, a dove, etc.]

^[5319] [Novatian was a keen analyst, and his allegorial renderings are logical generally, though sometimes fanciful.]

^[5320] Lev. xi. 4. [Jones of Nayland, vol. iii., Disquisition, ed. 1801.]

^[5321] “Enervem,” but more probably “informem.”

Chapter V. Argument.—But There Was a Limit to the Use of These Shadows or Figures; For Afterwards, When the End of the Law, Christ, Came, All Things Were Said by the Apostle to Be Pure to the Pure, and the True and Holy Meat Was a Right Faith and an Unspotted Conscience.

^[5322] Tit. i. 15.

^[5323] 1 Tim. iv. 4, 5.

^[5324] 1 Tim. iv. 1, 2, 3.

^[5325] 1 Cor. x. 25.

^[5326] Rom. xiv. 17.

^[5327] 1 Cor. vi. 13.

^[5328] [Or lower bowel, Mark vii. 19; Matt. xv. 17. See cap. i. note 7, p. 645, supra. It throws off refuse, leaving food only to the system.]

10 per page

Search Comments

This page has been visited 0033 times.

Contents