| << | Contents | >> |
De Principiis
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 2181
[2171] According to Pamphilus in his Apology, Origen, in a note on Tit. iii. 10, has made a statement the opposite of this. His words are: “But there are some also who say, that it was one Holy Spirit who was in the prophets, and another who was in the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ.”—Ruæus.
[2174] Qui licet non omnes possint per ordinem atque ad liquidum spiritualis intelligentiæ explanare consequentiam.
[2175] Ita per singulos, qui eum capere possunt, hoc efficitur, vel hoc intelligitur ipse Spiritus, quo indiget ille, qui eum participare meruerit. Schnitzer renders, “And so, in every one who is susceptible of them, the Spirit is exactly that which the receiver chiefly needs.”
Chapter VIII.—On the Soul (Anima).
[2180] Anima.
[2181] Animæ.
[2182] Animam animantium.
[2183] Gen. i. 21: πᾶσαν ψυχὴν ζώων, Sept.
[2184] Erasmus remarks, that φανταστική may be rendered imaginitiva, which is the understanding: ὁρμητική, impulsiva, which refers to the affections (Schnitzer).
[2185] Animam.
[2186] Lev. xvii. 14: ἡ ψυχὴ πάσης σαρκὸς αἶμα αὐτοῦ ἐστι, Sept.
[2187] Vitalis.
[2188] Animantia.
[2189] Gen. i. 24, living creature, animam.
[2190] Gen. ii. 7, animam viventem.
[2191] Lev. xvii. 10. It is clear that in the text which Origen or his translator had before him he must have read ψυχή instead of πρόσωπον: otherwise the quotation would be inappropriate (Schnitzer).
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0097 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page