| << | Contents | >> |
Remains of the Second and Third Centuries
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3538
Introductory Notice to Remains of the Second and Third Centuries.
[3529] See vol. ii. (p. 125), etc.
[3530] But see Lightfoot, A. F., part ii. vol. i. p. 524.
[3531] On Quadratus and Aristides, consult Routh, R. S., p. 71; also Westcott, On the Canon, p. 92.
[3532] In Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., iv. 3.
[3533] [Westcott supposes the Diognetus of Mathetes (vol. i. p. 23) may be the work of Quadratus; Canon, p. 96.]
[3534] Routh, R. S., vol. i. p. 93. Westcott, Canon, p. 106. Grabe’s mention. Routh’s discussion, in annotations, is most learned and exhaustive.
[3535] Barchochebas.
[3536] The Jews.
[3537] ῾Υποτυπώσῶς.
[3538] Contra Celsum, iv. 52.
[3539] Οὐκ ἀγεννῶς.
[3540] Routh, R. S., vol. i. p. 113. And see Westcott, Canon, p. 245.
[3541] Lightfoot, A. F., vol. ii. p. 48.
[3542] Ib., vol. i. p. 428.
[3543] Vol. ii. (Stromata) p. 301, this series.
[3544] Vol. i. p. 186, this series.
[3545] Lightfoot, A. F., vol. i. p. 468.
[3546] Lightfoot, A. F., vol. ii.
[3547] Ibid., pp. 446, 494.
[3548] “Which was delivered in the presence…and in which etc.” This appears to be the sense intended, and is that given by M. Renan: “Sermo qui factus est.” Cureton renders, “Who was in the presence, etc.,” and supposes that Melito first saw and conversed with the emperor, and afterwards wrote this discourse. Melito speaks of it more than once as written. This view, however, does not dispose of that fact that Melito is here affirmed to have “exhorted (lit., said to) Cæsar, etc.” It was clearly meant to be understood that the discourse, or speech, was spoken: the references to writing merely show that it was written, either before or after the delivery.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0020 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page