| << | Contents | >> |
Remains of the Second and Third Centuries
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3721
Introductory Notice to Remains of the Second and Third Centuries.
[3711] [Routh (also on Pinytus and Soter), R. S., p. 177. This series, vol. vi. p. 102, note 3. Note also Lightfoot, A. F., part ii. vol. ii. p. 192, note 1; and Westcott, Canon, p. 206.]
[3712] [Comp. p. 758, note 8, supra. Also Ignatius, vol. i. p. 63, at note 2, this series.]
[3713] mss. “planted.”
[3714] The text is evidently corrupt.
[3715] [For the reply of Pinytus, and what is said by Eusebius of seven other epistles, see Routh, R. S., vol. i. pp. 181–184.]
[3716] i.e., of such importance or of such a character.
[3717] In Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., v. 13.
[3718] Or Rhodo.
[3719] Vol. vii. pp. 333–338, this series, where I neglected to insert a reference to Routh, Rel. Sac., vol. ii. pp. 183–217.
[3720] H. E., book v. cap. 13.
[3721] Vol. ii. p. 62, this series.
[3722] See Origen, vol. iv. p. 567, this series.
[3723] Rel. Sac., vol. i. pp. 437–446.
[3724] The Marcionites.
[3725] Πολιτείᾳ. See Migne’s note.
[3726] ᾽Αρχήν. [See vol. vii. p. 365, this series.]
[3727] Δαιμονώσης.
[3728] Some copies have “Marcion the sailor,” and so Tertullian (de Præscriptionibus) speaks of him. [Vol. iii. cap. 30, p. 257, this series.]
[3729] Τὸν λόγον.
[3730] A fact which gave rise to a controversy, on which consult Routh, Rel. Sac., vol. ii. p. 78.
[3731] See vol. vi. p. 358, etc., this series, where I have spoken of Maximus as the original of the Dialogue ascribed to Methodius.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0020 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page