| << | Contents | >> |
Apologetic
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1159
[1149] See Isa. xli. 8; Jas. ii. 23.
[1150] Gen. 14.18; Psa. 110.4; Heb. 5.10; 7.1-3, 10, 15, 17.
[1151] Comp. Gen. xv. 13 with Ex. xii. 40-42 and Acts vii. 6.
[1153] Or, “credited him with.”
[1154] Gen. iv. 1-7, especially in the LXX.; comp.Heb. xi. 4.
[1155] Gen. vi. 18; vii. 23; 2 Pet. ii. 5.
[1156] See Gen. v. 22, 24; Heb. xi. 5.
[1157] Or, perhaps, “has not yet tasted.”
[1158] Æternitatis candidatus. Comp. ad Ux. l. i. c. vii., and note 3 there.
[1159] See above.
[1160] i.e., nephew. See Gen. xi. 31; xii. 5.
[1161] See Gen. xix. 1-29; and comp. 2 Pet. ii. 6-9.
Chapter III.—Of Circumcision and the Supercession of the Old Law.
[1162] See Gen. 12-15; 17; Rom. 4.
[1163] Acceperat. So Tertullian renders, as it appears to me, the ἔλαβε of St. Paul in Rom. iv. 11. q. v.
[1164] There is, if the text be genuine, some confusion here. Melchizedek does not appear to have been, in any sense, “subsequent” to Abraham, for he probably was senior to him; and, moreover, Abraham does not appear to have been “already circumcised” carnally when Melchizedek met him. Comp. Gen. 14; 17.
[1165] Tertullian writes Seffora; the LXX. in loco, Σεπφώρα Ex. iv. 24-26, where the Eng. ver. says, “the Lord met him,” etc.; the LXX ἄγγελος Κυρίου.
[1166] Isa. i. 7, 8. See c. xiii. sub fin.
[1167] Again an error; for these words precede the others. These are found in Isa. i. 2.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0207 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page