Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Apologetic

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1276

Introductory Note.

[1266] Strictly, Tertullian ought to have said “they call,” having above said “Divine scriptures;” as above on the preceding page.

[1267] Isa. i. 10.

[1268] See Gen. xix. 23-29.

[1269] Ezek. xvi. 3, 45.

[1270] Isa. i. 2, as before.

[1271] Orbis.

[1272] Oehler refers to Isa. xix. 1. See, too, Isa. 30; 31.

[1273] See Rev. xvii., etc.

[1274] Or we may supply here [“Isaiah”].

[1275] Or, “he.”

[1276] Ps. xlv. 3, clause 1 (in LXX. Ps. xliv. 4).

[1277] See Ps. xlv. 2 (xliv. 3 in LXX.).

[1278] Ps. xlv. 4 (xliv. 5 in LXX.).

[1279] Comp. Heb. iv. 12; Rev. i. 16; ii. 12; xix. 15, 21; also Eph. vi. 17.

[1280] Comp. Ps. lxii. 12 (lxi. 13 in LXX.); Rom. ii. 6.

[1281] See Ps. xlv. 5 (xliv. in LXX.).

[1282] Ps. xlv. 5 (xliv. 6 in LXX.).

[1283] Traductionem (comp.Heb. iv. 13).

[1284] Ps. xlv. 5.

[1285] I can find no authority for “appellatus” as a substantive, but such forms are familiar with Tertullian. Or perhaps we may render: “in that He is found to have been likewise called Jesus.”

[1286] Auses; Αὐσή in LXX.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0207 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>