Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Apologetic

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 153

Introductory Note.

[143] [Tertullian’s exposition of this enigmatical fact (see the Phædo) is better than divers other ingenious theories.]

[144] [John xxi. 19. A pious habit which long survived among Christians, when learning that death was at hand: as in Shakespeare’s Henry IV., “Laud be to God, ev’n there my life must end.” See 1 Thess. v. 18.]

Chapter XLVII.

[145] [See Irenæus, vol. i. p. 377 this Series.]

[146] [Elucidation X.]

[147] True, in the sense that a shadow cannot be projected by a body not yet existent.

Chapter XLVIII.

[148] [i.e., Caius, used (like John Doe with us) in Roman Law.]

[149] Know thyself. [Juvenal, xi. 27, on which see great wealth of reference in J.E.B. Mayor’s Juvenal (xiii. Satires), and note especially, Bernard, Serm. De Divers xl. 3. In Cant. Cantic. xxxvi. 5–7.]

[150] [Our author’s philosophy may be at fault, but his testimony is not to be mistaken.]

Chapter L.

[151] [Vicimus cum occidimur.]

[152] [Elucidation XI.]

[153] [Elucidation XII.]

I.

[154] Kaye, p. 36. Also, p. 8, supra.

III.

[155] Kaye (following L’Art de verifier les Dates) pp. 11 and 456.

IV.

[156] My references are to the Third Edition, London, Rivingtons, 1845.

V.

[157] In his edition of The Decline and Fall, Vol. I., p. 589, American reprint.

VI.

[158] pp. 85–88.

VII.

[159] Ep. ad Faust. xxxii. 13. and see Conybeare and Howson.

VIII.

[160] Compare Kaye on Mosheim, p. 107.

XII.

[161] pp. 129–140.

[162] Even under Commodus, vol. ii. p. 598, this series.

Chapter I.—Wide Scope of the Word Idolatry.

[163] [This solemn sentence vindicates the place I have given to the De Idololatria in the order adopted for this volume. After this and the Apology come three treatises confirming its positions, and vindicating the principles of Christians in conflict with Idolatry, the great generic crime of a world lying in wickedness. These three are the De Spectaculis, the De Corona and the Ad Scapulam. The De Spectaculis was written after this treatise, in which indeed it is mentioned (Cap. xiii.), but logically it follows, illustrates and enforces it. Hence my practical plan: which will be concluded by a scheme (conjectural in part) of chronological order in which precision is affirmed by all critics to be impossible, but, by which we may reach approximate accuracy, with great advantage. The De Idololatria is free from Montanism. But see Kaye, p. xvi.]

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0207 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>