Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Apologetic

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1533

Introductory Note.

[1523] Capit itaque et facturam provenisse poni.

[1524] Or, “inspiration.”

Chapter V.—Probable View of the Stoics, that the Soul Has a Corporeal Nature.

[1525] Ex quinta nescio qua substantia. Comp. Cicero’s Tuscul. i. 10.

[1526] Consitum.

[1527] De Nat. Rer. i. 305.

Chapter VI.—The Arguments of the Platonists for the Soul’s Incorporeality, Opposed, Perhaps Frivolously.

[1528] Animale, “having the nature of soul.”

[1529] Inanimale.

[1530] Accedit.

[1531] We follow Oehler’s view of this obscure passage, in preference to Rigaltius’.

[1532] See Tertullian’s Ad Nationes (our translation), p. 33, Supra..

[1533] Quinionem.

Chapter VII.—The Soul’s Corporeality Demonstrated Out of the Gospels.

[1534] Luke xvi. 23, 24.

[1535] Ad inferna. [See p. 59, supra.]

[1536] Diversorio.

[1537] Compare De Resur. Carnis, xvii. There is, however, some variation in Tertullian’s language on this subject. In his Apol. xlviii. he speaks as if the soul could not suffer when separated from the body. See also his De Testimonio Animæ, ch. iv., p. 177, supra; and see Bp. Kaye, p. 183.

Chapter VIII.—Other Platonist Arguments Considered.

[1538] Rev. i. 10.

[1539] Rev. vi. 9.

Chapter IX.—Particulars of the Alleged Communication to a Montanist Sister.

[1540] Habitum.

[1541] Illud trifariam distantivum (Τριχῶς διαστηματικόν) Fr. Junius.

[1542] Effigiem.

[1543] See his Phædo, pp. 105, 106.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0207 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>