Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Apologetic

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 1635

Introductory Note.

[1625] Intelligere sentire est.

[1626] Oehler has “anima;” we should rather have expected “animo,” which is another reading.

[1627] “Animo” this time.

[1628] Subjunctive verb, “fuerit.”

[1629] Dementit.

[1630] The opposite opinion was held by Tertullian’s opponents, who distinguished between the mind and the soul. They said, that when a man was out of his mind, his mind left him, but that his soul remained. (Lactantius, De Opif. xviii.; Instit. Div. vii. 12; La Cerda).

[1631] See his treatise, Against Marcion.

[1632] Rom. i. 20.

[1633] Facies.

[1634] Timæus, pp. 29, 30, 37, 38.

Chapter XIX.—The Intellect Coeval with the Soul in the Human Being. An Example from Aristotle Converted into Evidence Favourable to These Views.

[1635] His De Anima, ii. 2, 3.

[1636] Innixa et innexa.

[1637] Amabit.

[1638] Animationem. The possession and use of an “anima.”

[1639] Intellectuam.

[1640] Spiritu. The mental instinct, just mentioned.

[1641] Ps. viii. 2; Matt. xxi. 16.

[1642] Hebetes.

[1643] Matt. xxi. 15.

[1644] Matt. ii. 16-18.

Chapter XX.—The Soul, as to Its Nature Uniform, But Its Faculties Variously Developed. Varieties Only Accidental.

[1645] Sæpe noster.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0207 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>