Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Apologetic

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 410

Introductory Note.

[400] Rom. ii. 14.

[401] Rom. i. 26.

[402] [Plays were regarded as pomps renounced in Baptism.]

Chapter VIII.

[403] Isa. xxxviii. 21.

[404] 1 Tim. v. 23.

[405] 2 Tim. iv. 13. [This is a useful comment as showing what this φαιλόνη was. Our author translates it by pænula. Of which more when we reach the De Pallio.]

[406] John xiii. 1-5.

Chapter IX.

[407] [But see Eusebius, Hist. B. v., cap. 24, whose story is examined by Lardner, Cred., vol. iv., p. 448.]

[408] Isa. v. 12.

Chapter X.

[409] [Compare De Idololatria, cap. xv., p. 70, supra.]

[410] Ps. cxv. 4-8.

[411] Tit. i. 15.

[412] [He seems to know no use for incense except for burials and for fumigation.]

[413] 1 Cor. x. 28.

[414] [Kaye (p. 362) defends our author against Barbeyrac’s animadversions, by the maxim, “put yourself in his place” i.e. among the abominations of Paganism.]

[415] 1 Cor. x. 14.

[416] 1 John v. 21.

Chapter XI.

[417] [He plays on this word Sacramentum. Is the military sacrament to be added to the Lord’s?]

[418] 1 Cor. viii. 10.

[419] [Vexillum. Such words as these prepared for the Labarum.]

[420] “Outside of the military service.” By substituting ex militia for the corresponding words extra militiam, as has been proposed by Rigaltius, the sentence acquires a meaning such that desertion from the army is suggested as one of the methods by which a soldier who has become a Christian may continue faithful to Jesus. But the words extra militiam are a genuine part of the text. There is no good ground, therefore, for the statement of Gibbon: “Tertullian (de Corona Militis, c. xi.) suggests to them the expedient of deserting; a counsel which, if it had been generally known, was not very proper to conciliate the favour of the emperors toward the Christian sect.”—Tr.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0207 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>