| << | Contents | >> |
Apologetic
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 62
[52] It being from that book that the quotations are taken which make up the remainder of the tract, as Semler, worthless as his theories are, has well shown.
[53] “Sæculi” or “of the world,” or perhaps “of heathenism.”
[54] Catal. Scrippt. Eccles. c. 18.
[55] P. 952, tom. iii. Opp. ed. Bened.
[56] De Ecclesiæ dogmatibus, c. 55.
[57] Referred to in Adv. Marc. iv. 22. So Kaye thinks; but perhaps the reference is doubtful. See, however, the passage in Dr. Holmes’ translation in the present series, with his note thereon.
[58] De Scriptt. Eccles. 53, 24, 40.
[59] i.e., Rome.
[60] Antistes.
[61] A Marcionite at one time: he subsequently set up a sect of his own. He is mentioned in the adv. omn. Hær. c. 6.
[62] Censu.
[63] Catal. Scrippt. Eccles. c. 58.
[64] Catal. Scrippt. Eccles. c. 70.
[65] Oehler speaks more decidedly than Kaye.
[66] Epist. ad Eustochium de Custodia Virginitatis, p. 37, tom. iv. Opp. ed. Bened.; adv. Jovin. i. p. 157, tom. iv. Opp. ed. Bened.
[67] In the Catal. Scrippt. Eccles.
[68] “Mendacem” is his word. I know not whether he intends to charge Pamelius with wilful fraud.
[69] Doctor of the Sorbonne, said by Bossuet to have proved himself “a semi-Pelagian and Jansenist!” born in 1603, in Normandy, died in 1678.
[70] Jer. de Vir. Illust. c. 74.
[71] B. 470, d. 560.
[72] He must not be confounded with the still more famous John Albert Fabricius of the next century, referred to in p. xv. above.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0207 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page