| << | Contents | >> |
Apologetic
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 66
[56] De Ecclesiæ dogmatibus, c. 55.
[57] Referred to in Adv. Marc. iv. 22. So Kaye thinks; but perhaps the reference is doubtful. See, however, the passage in Dr. Holmes’ translation in the present series, with his note thereon.
[58] De Scriptt. Eccles. 53, 24, 40.
[59] i.e., Rome.
[60] Antistes.
[61] A Marcionite at one time: he subsequently set up a sect of his own. He is mentioned in the adv. omn. Hær. c. 6.
[62] Censu.
[63] Catal. Scrippt. Eccles. c. 58.
[64] Catal. Scrippt. Eccles. c. 70.
[65] Oehler speaks more decidedly than Kaye.
[66] Epist. ad Eustochium de Custodia Virginitatis, p. 37, tom. iv. Opp. ed. Bened.; adv. Jovin. i. p. 157, tom. iv. Opp. ed. Bened.
[67] In the Catal. Scrippt. Eccles.
[68] “Mendacem” is his word. I know not whether he intends to charge Pamelius with wilful fraud.
[69] Doctor of the Sorbonne, said by Bossuet to have proved himself “a semi-Pelagian and Jansenist!” born in 1603, in Normandy, died in 1678.
[70] Jer. de Vir. Illust. c. 74.
[71] B. 470, d. 560.
[72] He must not be confounded with the still more famous John Albert Fabricius of the next century, referred to in p. xv. above.
[73] Whole of these metrical fragments.
[74] Lardner, Credibility, vol. iii. p. 169, under “Victorinus of Pettaw,” ed. Kippis, Lond. 1838.
[75] See Lardner, as above.
[76] See Migne, who prefixes this judgment of Rig. to the de Judicio Domini.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0207 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page