<< | Contents | >> |
Anti-Marcion
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 3400
Introduction, by the American Editor.
[3390] i.e., the Jews.
[3391] Or perhaps, “are found to belong to the Creator’s Christ, not to Marcion’s.”
[3392] Marcion denied that there was any prophecy of national or Gentile conversion; it was only the conversion of individual proselytes that he held.
[3393] Allectio.
[3394] Exorta est.
[3396] Sibynas, Σιβύνη· ὅπλον δόρατι παραπλήσιον. Hesychius, “Sibynam appellant Illyrii telum venabuli simile.” Paulus, ex Festo, p. 336, Müll. (Oehler.)
[3398] Allectio.
[3399] Junius explains the author’s induxerunt by deleverunt; i.e., “they annulled your opinion about proselytes being the sole called, by their promulgation of the gospel.”
[3402] Pamelius regards this as a quotation from Isa. xlvi. 12, 13, only put narratively, in order to indicate briefly its realization.
[3403] Atquin.
[3405] Universæ.
[3406] Comp. Psa. 2.2-3; Acts 4.25-30.
[3407] Exprobrat.
[3409] Wisd. of Sol. ii. 12.
[3410] Ezek. ix. 4. The ms. which T. used seems to have agreed with the versions of Theodotion and Aquila mentioned thus by Origen (Selecta in Ezek.): ὁ δὲ ᾽Ακύλας καὶ Θεοδοτίων φασι. Σημείωσις τοῦ Θαῦ ἐπὶ τὰ μέτωπα, κ.τ.λ. Origen, in his own remarks, refers to the sign of the cross, as indicated by this letter. Ed. Bened. (by Migne), iii. 802.
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0697 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page