<< | Contents | >> |
Anti-Marcion
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 5095
Introduction, by the American Editor.
[5085] Ad vanitatem Marcionis. [Note 9, p. 289.]
[5086] Peponem. In his De Anima, c. xxxii., he uses this word in strong irony: “Cur non magis et pepo, tam insulsus.”
[5087] [This text, imperfectly quoted in the original, is filled out by Dr. Holmes.]
[5088] So the Septuagint in Jer. xi. 19, Ξύλον εἰς τὸν ἄρτον αὐτοῦ (A.V. “Let us destroy the tree with the fruit”). See above, book iii. chap. xix. p. 337.
[5089] Illuminator antiquitatum. This general phrase includes typical ordinances under the law, as well as the sayings of the prophets.
[5091] Isa. lxiii. 1 (Sept. slightly altered).
[5092] In Juda.
[5095] Ipse.
[5096] This is an argumentum ad hominem against Marcion for his cavil, which was considered above in book ii. chap. v.–viii. p. 300.
[5097] Obstitit peccaturo.
[5098] Si ignorabat. One would have expected “si non ignorabat,” like the “si sciebat” of the next step in the argument.
[5099] The original of this not very clear sentence is: “Nam et Petrum præsumptorie aliquid elocutum negationi potius destinando zeloten deum tibi ostendit.”
[5104] Oehler’s admirable edition is also carefully printed for the most part, but surely his quæsisset must here be quæsissent.
Search Comments 
This page has been visited 0697 times.
<< | Contents | >> |
10 per page