Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Anti-Marcion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 5105

Introduction, by the American Editor.

[5095] Ipse.

[5096] This is an argumentum ad hominem against Marcion for his cavil, which was considered above in book ii. chap. v.–viii. p. 300.

[5097] Obstitit peccaturo.

[5098] Si ignorabat. One would have expected “si non ignorabat,” like the “si sciebat” of the next step in the argument.

[5099] The original of this not very clear sentence is: “Nam et Petrum præsumptorie aliquid elocutum negationi potius destinando zeloten deum tibi ostendit.”

[5100] Luke 22.34, 54-62.

[5101] Luke xxii. 47-49.

[5102] Isa. xxix. 13.

[5103] Luke xxii. 66, 67.

[5104] Oehler’s admirable edition is also carefully printed for the most part, but surely his quæsisset must here be quæsissent.

[5105] Luke xxii. 67.

[5106] Supersedit ostendere.

[5107] i.e., not to answer that question of theirs. This seems to be the force of the perfect tense, “occultasse se.”

[5108] He makes Jesus stretch forth His hand, porrigens manum inquit.

[5109] Luke xxii. 69.

[5110] Dan. vii. 13.

[5111] Ps. cx. 1.

[5112] Luke xxii. 70.

[5113] Luke xxii. 70.

[5114] Or does he suppose that they repeated this same question twice? His words are, “dum rursus interrogant.”

[5115] Either, “Art thou,” or, “Thou art, then, the Son of God.”

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0697 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>