Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Anti-Marcion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 5629

Introduction, by the American Editor.

[5619] Ps. lxx. 17.

[5620] Ps. lxx. 17.

[5621] Ps. lxx. 18.

[5622] Ps. lxx. 19.

[5623] Ps. lxx. 9.

[5624] 1 Cor. xv. 25, 27.

[5625] Consecuturus.

Chapter X.—Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Body, Continued. How are the Dead Raised? and with What Body Do They Come? These Questions Answered in Such a Sense as to Maintain the Truth of the Raised Body, Against Marcion. Christ as the Second Adam Connected with the Creator of the First Man. Let Us Bear the Image of the Heavenly. The Triumph Over Death in Accordance with the Prophets. Hosea and St. Paul Compared.

[5626] He refers to his De Resurrect. Carnis. See chap. xlviii.

[5627] 1 Cor. xv. 29.

[5628] Viderit.

[5629] Kalendæ Februariæ. The great expiation or lustration, celebrated at Rome in the month which received its name from the festival, is described by Ovid, Fasti, book ii., lines 19–28, and 267–452, in which latter passage the same feast is called Lupercalia. Of course as the rites were held on the 15th of the month, the word kalendæ here has not its more usual meaning (Paley’s edition of the Fasti, pp. 52–76). Oehler refers also to Macrobius, Saturn. i. 13; Cicero, De Legibus, ii. 21; Plutarch, Numa, p. 132. He well remarks (note in loc.), that Tertullian, by intimating that the heathen rites of the Februa will afford quite as satisfactory an answer to the apostle’s question, as the Christian superstition alluded to, not only means no authorization of the said superstition for himself, but expresses his belief that St. Paul’s only object was to gather some evidence for the great doctrine of the resurrection from the faith which underlay the practice alluded to. In this respect, however, the heathen festival would afford a much less pointed illustration; for though it was indeed a lustration for the dead, περὶ νεκρῶν, and had for its object their happiness and welfare, it went no further than a vague notion of an indefinite immortality, and it touched not the recovery of the body. There is therefore force in Tertullian’s si forte.

[5630] Si forte.

[5631] τῷ εὔχεσθαι ὑπὲρ τῶν νεκρῶν (Rigalt.).

[5632] Eph. iv. 5.

[5633] Pro corporibus.

[5634] Eph. iv. 5.

[5635] Corpora.

[5636] Ut, with the subjunctive verb induxerit.

[5637] 1 Cor. xv. 35.

[5638] Consequens erat.

[5639] Porro.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0697 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>