| << | Contents | >> |
Anti-Marcion
Show All Footnotes & Jump to 5876
Introduction, by the American Editor.
[5866] Rigaltius (after Fulvius Ursinus) read “non erasit,” but with insufficient authority; besides, the context shows that he was referring to the large erasure which he had already mentioned, so that the non is inadmissible. Marcion must, of course, be understood to have retained Rom. xi. 33; hence the argument in this sentence.
[5868] Isa. xl. 13, quoted (according to the Sept.) by the apostle in Rom. xi. 34, 35.
[5869] Plane: ironically.
[5884] Rom. 12.19; Deut. 32.25.
Search Comments
This page has been visited 0697 times.
| << | Contents | >> |
10 per page