Appearance      Marker   

 

<<  Contents  >>

Anti-Marcion

Footnotes

Show All Footnotes

Show All Footnotes & Jump to 6118

Introduction, by the American Editor.

[6108] Phil. ii. 8.

[6109] Phil. ii. 8.

[6110] Non enim exaggeraret.

[6111] Virtutem: perhaps the power.

[6112] See the preceding note.

[6113] Candidæ pharisaeæ: see Phil. iii. 4-6.

[6114] Phil. iii. 7.

[6115] Phil. iii. 8.

[6116] Phil. iii. 9.

[6117] Phil. iii. 20.

[6118] Gen. xxii. 17.

[6119] 1 Cor. xv. 41.

[6120] Phil. iii. 21. [I have adhered to the original Greek, by a trifling verbal change, because Tertullian’s argument requires it.]

[6121] 1 Cor. xv. 51, 52.

[6122] Deputari, which is an old reading, should certainly be demutari, and so say the best authorities. Oehler reads the former, but contends for the latter.

[6123] 1 Thess. iv. 16, 17.

Chapter XXI.—The Epistle to Philemon. This Epistle Not Mutilated. Marcion’s Inconsistency in Accepting This, and Rejecting Three Other Epistles Addressed to Individuals. Conclusions. Tertullian Vindicates the Symmetry and Deliberate Purpose of His Work Against Marcion.

[6124] Inspector: perhaps critic.

[6125] Retro: in the former portions of this treatise.

[6126] Expunxerimus.

[6127] Qua eruimus ipsa ista.

[6128] [Elucidation II.]

Chapter I.—The Opinions of Hermogenes, by the Prescriptive Rule of Antiquity Shown to Be Heretical. Not Derived from Christianity, But from Heathen Philosophy. Some of the Tenets Mentioned.

 

 

 

10 per page

 

 

 Search Comments 

 

This page has been visited 0697 times.

 

<<  Contents  >>